Creative demand: Taiwan says radical school reform will set it apart

The island nation is ready to abandon rote memorization in favor of innovation and creative expression throughout its education system by 2018. 

PICHI CHUANG/Reuters
Taiwanese students, seen here earlier in August protesting history textbook changes, also face curriculum reforms that will emphasize greater creativity, starting in 2018.

Taiwan plans a radical reform of its education system, one aiming to set it apart in East Asia by playing up creativity and student initiative instead of the rote memorization that dominates classroom learning in this part of the world.

Goaded by a low birth rate and a perception that high-tech innovation elsewhere in Asia is surpassing Taiwan’s own prized IT industry, the education ministry has drawn in teaching examples from classrooms as far off as Finland and New Zealand.

New curriculum approved by the education ministry will phase in starting in 2018, retooling class work from first grade to high school. 

The approach aims to encourage students to innovate and improvise, and to be more expressive and think more broadly about the world. The current traditional Chinese curriculum here, a carryover from China's dynastic period, is built around testing student memory. 

The ministry has not yet developed specific class content or teaching methods. But the initiative is drawing stiff opposition from parents who say the changes will require their children to attend remedial classes to make up for lessons not learned. 

“Our students need to be more creative,” says Ma Hsiang-ping, executive secretary with the education ministry’s Office of Higher Education, Innovation, and Transformation. “Things aren’t the same now as 20 years ago.”

Creativity to promote IT start ups

At the same time, Taiwan’s university admission criteria will begin to emphasize candidate interviews and students experience outside school, in addition to the entrance exams used now.

“Our exam-based system is too tough and not good for anyone. We use it just for the sake of rising to the next level of study,” says Chu Chen, a high school junior in Taipei as he prepares to begin his final school year starting Aug. 31. “You don’t need to demand so much uniformity.”

Part of the impetus for change comes from a desire for the island nation to more readily spawn start up companies and cutting-edge technology. Start-ups are crucial for Taiwan’s $122.5 billion high-tech industry, which represents about a quarter of the nation’s GDP.

Since the 1980s, Taiwan's IT sector has relied on contract work rather than its own designs. But contract orders are flowing out now to China, Vietnam, and other parts of Asia with lower production costs.

High school graduates who show originality in interviews or extracurricular laurels in their college applications would be more likely to launch companies later, Ms. Ma says.

“Reforming the education system should help to encourage innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship, which is certainly a way for Taiwan to boost competitiveness and maintain long-term economic performance,” says Ma Tieying, an economist with DBS Bank in Singapore.

In Taiwan today, as in much of East Asia, students with the best textbook recall – often aided by after-school brush-up lessons and pre-exam cram sessions – earn standardized test scores that determine whether they enter top high schools, and later the top universities.

Many younger Taiwanese, however, stress the need for their island to find a distinct identity from other East Asian nations.

'Four hours pass, five hours fail'

In China, university entrance exams each June put so much pressure on high school students that parents try to stop noisy construction work so their offspring can study in peace. Japanese students use the expression “four hours pass, five hours fail” to describe the make-or-break amounts of sleep required before high school placement exams.

Taiwan wants to be more like Western countries, says Taiwan book publisher and historian Yang Lian-fu. “Education officials think the light in the West is brighter, that school there is happier and more relaxed,” he says.

The education ministry says lack of innovation steers too many of each year's 300,000 university graduates into more traditional jobs rather than riskier ventures, particularly in high-tech.

“Taiwanese parents, according to their culture, value stability, including stable jobs, but still there are quite a few students who would like to go out and do something different,” Ms. Ma says.

Taiwanese officials fret further about competitiveness because the island has the world’s third lowest fertility rate, a threat to the future workforce, and many of its 160 universities have few academic laurels and are open to nearly anyone.

Still, students and parents are skeptical about the reforms, worried that private classes will be needed to supplement learning. 

“There’s logic to the changes, but how you do it, that’s the key point,” says Yang Shang-en, a third-year university design major in Taipei. “If I had to study outside class to develop some other talent, if the government required that, it would be more of a burden for me."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.