Why did China just release five feminist activists?

The five women, all veteran activists, were arrested in Beijing last month for planning a public campaign against sexual harassment. China has previously resisted criticism from abroad towards its detention policies.

|
Tyrone Siu/Reuters
Portraits of Li Tingting (top l.), Wei Tingting (top r.), (bottom, l.-r.) Wang Man, Wu Rongrong, and Zheng Churan are pictured during a protest calling for their release in Hong Kong April 11, 2015.
|
Reuters/File
Wang Man was one of five female Chinese activists released from jail on Monday.

Sidestepping a snowballing international public relations disaster, China on Monday evening freed five women who had been detained since early March for organizing a campaign against sexual harassment.

Their fate had drawn widespread attention at home and criticism from US officials and human rights groups. Advocates for the women say this external pressure paid off with their release after the prosecutor decided not to press charges. China is preparing to co-host a United Nations meeting on women’s rights in New York in September.   

Still, such campaigns can backfire since China is generally reluctant to bow to public pressure. International protests against the trials of 2010 Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo and later of Ilham Tohti, a prominent moderate advocate of Uyghur rights, did nothing to save them from heavy jail sentences.

“Those were political cases,” says Liu Xiaoyuan, a lawyer for artist-provocateur Ai Weiwei who was detained for nearly three months in 2011. “If a case is related to national security it is treated differently from a case about something like women’s rights.”

Mr. Ai was freed after a noisy international campaign on his behalf by world-renowned cultural figures. “His detention really changed attitudes to China among a huge number of influential people,” says Jerome Cohen, a law professor at New York University who follows Chinese legal affairs closely. “The government learned its lessonwhen it comes to cases not deemed to directly involve national security. 

The five young women, all experienced activists with a reputation for staging imaginative public “happenings” to draw attention to violations of women’s rights, had been planning a leafleting campaign against sexual harassment on public transport to coincide with International Women’s Day on March 8th .

They were detained the day before on pre-emptive charges that they had been “picking quarrels and provoking trouble,” which carries a maximum five-year jail sentence. Their arrests came before they could do anything. The police then changed the charge to “gathering crowds to disturb public order” referring to two “happenings” carried out in 2012. The prosecutor appears to have found insufficient evidence for that charge too.

“This is largely a result of external support,” says Wang Qiushi, one of the women’s lawyers. “The appeals from foreign political leaders and women's rights groups played a very important role in the release.”

Calls from abroad

Last Friday, US Secretary of State John Kerry urged the Chinese authorities to “immediately and unconditionally” free the women. Hillary Clinton also denounced their detention.

“This is a case where internal and external public opinion has played a role,” says Mr. Cohen. “Without it they would certainly have been prosecuted.”

At the same time, adds Mr. Wang, “the women did not commit any crime so they should not have been detained in the first place.”

Women’s rights activists welcomed their release. “The unprecedented huge mobilization of global feminist and other non-governmental organizations’ support is effective,” wrote Wang Zheng, a professor of women’s studies at the University of Michigan, in a post on ChinaChange.org, a pro-democracy website.

Ms. Wang also drew hope from signs that “the Chinese government is not a monolithic entity and the decision is a compromise between different political factions … there were officials in the system who pushed very hard towards a positive solution.”

UN women's meeting

As well as international opprobrium, domestic public pressure can also be effective in China. In 2010, Deng Yujiao, a young woman working in a pedicure parlor, was initially charged with murder for killing a government official who had tried to force himself on her. The charge was dropped after nearly four million people expressed their sympathy for her on social media.

The case of the five detained feminists was especially embarrassing internationally because China is due to co-host a UN meeting in September, marking the 20th  anniversary of the fourth world conference on women held in Beijing in 1995. Mrs. Clinton, then First Lady, now presidential aspirant, delivered a forceful speech on feminism and human rights at that conference. 

In a letter to the prosecutor, the five women’s relatives wrote that their detention was unjustified because they had been acting “in line … with our law for the protection of women and children and with the core values of socialism.”

The women were not freed unconditionally, but on bail. Their bail conditions are not yet known, but will restrict their freedom of movement and action and could prevent them from communicating amongst themselves for up to a year while the police continue their investigation.

Given their history of activism, however, those who know the women say they do not expect them to stay silent. “Wei Tingting will decide what to do,” Wang said of his client. “But I personally do not think she will give up.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why did China just release five feminist activists?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2015/0414/Why-did-China-just-release-five-feminist-activists
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe