Beijing to residents: Less spitting, more queuing (please)

China is hosting the APEC forum in November. City authorities are urging residents to improve their manners and claim that more are already lining up at bus stops.

Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters
A watermelon vendor takes a nap while waiting for customers during a hot day in Beijing June 5, 2014.

When they are abroad, Chinese officials like to boast of their country’s “five thousand years of civilization.” But at home, the government has long fretted its citizens are not civilized enough.

They jaywalk, officials complain; they spit; they litter; they curse at sports events; they cut in line.

And lest their bad manners embarrass visiting foreign leaders in November, when the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum meets in Beijing, the city fathers this week launched a “residents’ mass civilization practice campaign.”

When people in the west complain about living in a “nanny state” it is because the authorities try to stop them doing anything remotely risky. In China, the “nanny state,” with all the authoritarian gravitas the ruling Communist party can muster, tries to stop its citizens being naughty.

“You should always say “hello” “thank you” and “sorry,” insisted Tian Wensong at a press conference on Tuesday to launch Beijing's campaign, sounding for all the world like a kindergarten teacher.

Actually, Mr. Tian is the section chief responsible for the Promotion of Civilized Behavior in the Capital Civilization Office. It is a job akin to being a herder of cats, in a city where the key rule of behavior is “every man for himself.”

This is not the first such attempt to instill civility in Beijing residents. In the run-up to the 2008 Olympic Games the authorities cracked down on littering and disorderly bus-mounting habits, and they claim some success. “Most Beijingers now stand in line at bus stops of their own accord,” said Tian’s boss, Han Longbin.

Mr. Han said his department is still struggling with "traffic order and people crossing the road against red lights." And Tian offered a simple solution: “Do not rush to be first."

The officials gave few details of exactly how they will go about civilizing their citizenry, but promised “teach-ins” on green lifestyles and waste disposal; a campaign to make residents sign a pledge to be civilized; and a school essay competition to “guide students to be brilliant, courteous, civilized and responsible Beijingers.”

Han cautioned against expecting too much of the campaign. “Civilization cannot be built overnight,” he pointed out.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.