Australia's Rudd calls election, hoping to revive Labor's fortunes

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has called parliamentary elections after less than two months on the job.

Lukas Coch/AP
Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd announced parliamentary elections on Sunday.

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has called an election for Sept. 7, with polls predicting a tight race for the votes of an electorate sharply divided over refugee policy, the economy, education, and global warming.

Since taking over from Julia Gillard just six weeks ago, Prime Minister Rudd has resuscitated his center-left Labor Party’s fortunes with a series of popular policies and he's gambling that the time is right to cement Labor's position. The opposition led by Tony Abbott is currently favored in the polls, however.

"Australians now face a choice. And the choice couldn't be starker," Rudd said shortly after meeting with the governor general to set the Sept. 7 election date. "Right now the only thing standing between Australia and an Abbott-led government is you, me, and as many Australians as we can rally to fight for the kind of nation we all want to live in."

Labor was set for an election wipe-out before Rudd defeated the unpopular Ms. Gillard, Australia’s first female prime minister, in a party-room vote on June 26. Since he's announced a deal with Papua New Guinea to intern foreign asylum seekers there, promised to end an unpopular carbon tax, targeted the corruption-tainted New South Wales branch of the Labor Party and fine-tuned economic policy to deal with slackening demand for Australian natural resources in China.

A former diplomat, Rudd won a landslide victory in 2007 and steered Australia largely unscathed through the global financial crisis. But his often chaotic leadership style saw him toppled in a Labor leadership contest by Gillard in mid-2010.

Gillard emerged from the last election at the head of a minority government and relied on the support of a number of independents. Although most polls put Abbott’s Liberal Party-led coalition slightly ahead in the polls, Rudd has been steadily narrowing the gap.

Speaking to reporters shortly after Rudd’s announcement, Abbott said the election was about a ''clear choice'' between the ''positive'' plans of the Coalition and ''more of the same'' under Labor.  

On Saturday Rudd signed an agreement with the president of Nauru, Baron Waqa, to process and settle children and family groups who arrive by boat seeking asylum in Australia. The deal with Nauru came two weeks after asylum seekers vented their anger over the slow pace of processing their claims for refugee status by setting fire to the existing detention center on the island.

The Nauru and Papua New Guinea deals mean that no asylum seekers arriving by boat will be resettled in Australia. Refugee advocates have criticized the policy as callous. But both parties have put border protection and stopping the boats of asylum seekers, mostly from Afghanistan, Iran, and Sri Lanka, at the top of their political agendas.

There are more than 14 million Australians on the electoral rolls and voting is compulsory. Labor now holds 71 seats in the 150-seat House of Representatives, the Coalition holds 72 and 7 are held by independents.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.