Weibos: China clamps down on popular microblogs

Weibos are the freest place in China to speak. Now Chinese authorities are moving to curb that freedom.

Visitors walked past a booth for Sina Weibo at last summer’s Shanghai Book Fair. Sina is similar to Twitter.

Just a few years ago, no ordinary Chinese citizen would ever have heard sensitive news – say, for example, if a top Chinese policeman had spent a day in a US consulate, apparently seeking asylum.

But when that happened in February, it was all over China's hugely popular Twitter equivalents within hours.

Resourceful "citizen journalists" posted photos of police massing outside the US Consulate in Chengdu, screenshots of an airline passenger manifest, and other evidence suggesting that Wang Lijun had been at the consulate and then escorted to Beijing by a senior Chinese security official. More than 2 million posts flooded China's "weibos" – Twitter-like microblogs – in just a few days.

"Weibos are the freest place in China to speak," and anonymity is key to that says Zhang Ming, a politics professor at Beijing's Renmin University and a prolific microblogger.

But now the Chinese authorities are moving to curb that freedom, leading many to fear that the microblogs' freewheeling days are numbered.

Target: 'harmful information'

In the name of reducing the spread of pornography, defamation, and other "harmful information," the government is requiring weibo bloggers to register their police-issued personal identification number in order to post.

The move is designed to combat "irrational voices and negative public opinion," says the head of China's Internet regulator agency, Wang Chen. But many bloggers and Internet analysts fear that registration will cast a chill over the microblogs.

" 'Real name' registration will make people more aware of what they say," worries He Weifang, a microblogging law professor at Peking University. The fact that weibo operators will have to reveal user identities to police if asked will scare people off, he says.

"The government is telling microbloggers 'we are watching what you say,' " adds Bill Bishop, an Internet analyst here.

100s of millions use weibos

Microblogs have been the biggest craze in China for the past two years. Nearly half of China's 513 million Internet users have signed up for a weibo account, most of them on Sina and Tencent, the two most popular portals. (Twitter is blocked by government censors.) Chinese microbloggers send or re-post 150 million messages every day – compared with the 200 million daily tweets worldwide.

In a country where official media have little public credibility, 70 percent of micro­bloggers use weibo accounts as their primary source of news, according to a recent report by the China Academy of Social Sciences, and 60 percent regard them as reliable.

Under the new rules, currently in effect in Beijing and a handful of other cities but slated to go nationwide this year, users will still be able to follow others without registering their real identities; they just won't be allowed to post their own comments.

But the appeal of weibos depends on prominent "thought leaders," says Mark Natkin, who runs an Internet consultancy here.

The December requirement that new users identify themselves seems to have already had an impact.

Chilling effect

Sina Weibo, which boasted 20 million new users every month last year, signed up only 3 million new users in January, according to Chinese press reports.

"That's a pretty precipitous falloff," says Mr. Bishop. Although the drop could reflect the fact that many accounts on Sina are "zombie" accounts created to boost the number of followers for various bloggers, it also suggests that citizens are reluctant to reveal themselves to weibo operators.

Microblogs have posed a problem to the government, says Bishop, because "control of propaganda is a key pillar in the government's control of the country, and weibos cut out the propaganda apparatus." Weibos enable people to communicate directly with each other. "Information is getting out all over the place," he says.

The speed at which messages can be re-posted "is almost instantaneous," adds Mr. Natkin. "It's like Pandora's box. Once something's out, it's out."

Local government officials especially "feel very unhappy and very threatened" by weibos, says Zhan Jiang, a journalism professor at Beijing's Foreign Studies University, because local scandals can attract central government attention very quickly.

Sina Weibo and other operators have created "rumor control" departments that employ people and automated keyword filters to censor sensitive posts; they can block users from posting messages that touch on awkward issues and close accounts belonging to repeat offenders such as prominent dissident artist Ai Weiwei. But these controls are not always 100 percent effective.

The new rules, issued by Beijing, ban weibo users from a range of vaguely defined activities, such as "undermining national unity," "spreading rumors, disturbing social order, or undermining social stability," and "illegal activities on behalf of civil society organizations."

If people are less willing to post on sensitive topics, the Chinese blogosphere will become less lively and less appealing, observers say. "There's a risk that microblogs will become irrelevant," warns Professor He. "If fewer and fewer people use them, their influence will wane."

Real name registration would not be a problem if free speech were not a crime, adds Professor Zhang. "But in China, it is still a crime."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Weibos: China clamps down on popular microblogs
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today