A US-Mexico policy duet?

Mexico's President-elect Peña Nieto and Obama met yesterday and sang the same tune on many bilateral agenda items. Can their common goals survive their respective political systems?

Jacquelyn Martin/AP
President Barack Obama shakes hands with Mexico's President-elect Enrique Pena Nieto prior to their meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 27.

• A version of this post ran on the author's blog, bloggingsbyboz.com. The views expressed are the author's own.

According to El Universal, President Obama started his meeting with President-elect Enrique Peña Nieto by saying, "Let's go beyond the security agenda. We want to prioritize the topics of infrastructure, trade, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, energy and immigration." That nicely lines up with the areas of focus that EPN and his team had set out.
 
Obama praised EPN's "ambitious reform agenda" and made it clear that his administration wants to see some of the proposed reforms passed because, "what happens in Mexico has an impact on our society."
 
Mexico's president-elect also echoed some White House talking points by emphasizing the importance both leaders have in creating jobs. He also fully supported Obama's position on comprehensive immigration reform and said Mexico would do its part to create a safe and modern border.

RELATED: Think you know Mexico? Take our quiz and find out!

Yesterday's meeting showed the two leaders starting the relationship off on the right foot, practically tripping over each other's talking points to agree on their agenda. That's a great sign, but this was an easy and fairly scripted meeting. Passing their common agenda through their respective political systems and implementing the policies successfully are going to be harder.

– James Bosworth is a freelance writer and consultant who runs Bloggings by Boz.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.