In landmark election, Venezuelan voters see two futures

Venezuelan voters, who are electing a president today, will either keep Hugo Chavez in power or give a chance to his challenger Henrique Capriles.

Tomas Bravo/Reuters
Venezuelans line up outside a voting station during the presidential election in Caracas October 7. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez faces the toughest election of his 14-year rule on Sunday in a vote pitting his charisma and oil-financed largesse against fresh-faced challenger Henrique Capriles' promise of jobs, safer streets and an end to cronyism.

Venezuelans are casting ballots today in one of the most important elections of their lifetimes.

With their votes today, they will either keep their current president Hugo Chavez in power or elect the opposition candidate Henrique Capriles into office. Mr. Chavez has promised to forge forward with his “socialist revolution,” while Mr.Capriles has cast himself as a moderate who will maintain social safety nets for the poor but put Venezuela’s economy on more stable footing.

Surveys have varied wildly on who is poised to win today, but supporters of each side are convinced that they have the edge – and that their choice is the only viable option for Venezuela.

In the upscale neighborhood of Chacao, an opposition stronghold, voters lined up in the middle of the night to cast their ballots, despite the fact that polls didn’t open until 6 a.m. this morning.

"We’re here because we want change," says Arnaldo Palvera, an architecture student, who arrived at 5:15 a.m. to cast his ballot. He says he has no doubts about who will win today’s race.

Neither does Juan Nieto, a clothes salesman, who arrived even earlier, at 4:15 a.m. "We’re going to win."
It’s the kind of confidence that the opposition has not exhibited since Chavez took office in 1999. For nearly 14 years Chavez has easily held onto power - until now. And many of his foes are taking as proof long lines and enthusiasm across Caracas as a sign that, this time, he really might lose.

Juan Carlos Mosqueda, a cab driver, says that transporting passengers west to east and back west again across the city today, he has never seen such long queues outside of polling stations. "In 14 years, this is the best chance we have for a new president, there are so many new voters," he says. "It's close, very, very close. It’s now or never for change."

Far away from the modern shopping malls of Chacao, in the poorer neighborhoods across the capital city, stand other types of development, the markings of Chavez’s nearly 14 years in power called "missions," or social programs for the poor. In downtown Caracas, a Chavez stronghold, new houses are wrapped in a government banner to identify his latest mission to address the city's housing crisis.

Here, long lines and enthusiasm are just as high as in the opposition strongholds. "He [President Chavez] has helped a lot of people," says Pedro Gonzalez, an accountant, who lives in the area and says many of his friends and neighbors have benefited from the government’s housing initiative.

"We need to finish what we started," adds Chavez supporter Tina Periche, a juice vendor who says she distrusts challenger Capriles because his policies are “neoliberal” and “capitalist,” she says. "The president and his missions, housing, health, and culture (are) a plan for all of us."

Surveys have revealed a high number of undecided voters who could determine the outcome of the race. The opposition has said that many of  those votes will go to Capriles, one of the reasons they are confident about long lines today.

But votes among the “undecided” will also be going to Chavez, like that of Andres Barros Latan, a retired university professor who says he is voting for Chavez this year for the first time since he took office. Before, he says, he was reluctant but now he is convinced of the president’s commitment to the poor.

"We [the poor] are the majority, and the government works to make things better," he says.

It is this complex voting picture that will make today's race, and Venezuela's future, an unknown until the final ballot is counted.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.