Armed with sticks, Colombia's Nasa tribe attacks a military base

The Nasa tribe has long been caught in the crossfire between the Colombian government and the FARC. As fighting has increased in recent months, the tribe has asked both sides to leave its area.

Courtesy of ElTiempo/Reuters
The Nasa indigenous people, who live in the Cauca region, participate in a demonstration to demand that the military and the FARC abandon their ancestral lands in Toribio on Tuesday, July 17.

• A version of this post ran on the author's blog, The views expressed are the author's own.

The Nasa tribe in Colombia has long been caught in the crossfire between government and FARC attacks. As the fighting has increased in recent months, the tribe has asked both sides to leave the area.
The Colombian government has based much of its security strategy around territorial control and protection of populations. Security gains in recent years have come due to increased security presence in population centers. They believe that removing the military from the area would cede ground to the FARC and be a step back in terms of security.
This led to an odd event yesterday in which the indigenous, armed only with sticks, attacked a Colombian military outpost. The Colombian military, to its credit and with a bit of role-reversing irony, did not retaliate with violence and actually engaged in some non-violent resistance strategies to try to prevent their removal from the base (BBC, El Tiempo).

How much sovereignty do indigenous have over their territories? In recent years, it's a question we've seen play out in Bolivia with plans to develop a road through the TIPNIS reserve, in Ecuador with water rights, and in Peru with fights over development in the Amazon that left dozens dead in Bagua. Questions about national vs local control, particularly of indigenous areas, are often tense and are made even worse by the presence of a third party criminal/terrorist/guerrilla group like the FARC who are also trying to control territory.
In Colombia, the question is whether an indigenous group can request that government security forces completely leave its territory. In some ways, though not formally, it's a request for sovereignty or even secession from the country's government. In this situation, the Colombian government is left with two bad choices: leave the area and perhaps allow the FARC to gain further control or engage in some sort of repression against the indigenous group so that the security forces can stay.
The fact yesterday's confrontation occurred without a single death is remarkably positive given the tensions. The less violence, the better. I think the Colombian government understands that they need to find a non-violent way out of this confrontation without giving up territory or control to the FARC in the process. They should accept mediation and negotiations and work with the community to find the right balance.

James Bosworth is a freelance writer and consultant based in Managua, Nicaragua, who runs Bloggings by Boz.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to