Latin American indigenous groups fight technology with technology

Skype and social media are becoming key tools for indigenous groups in their fights against mining, dams, and other unwanted development, says a guest blogger.

• A version of this post ran on the author's blog, bloggingsbyboz.com. The views expressed are the author's own.

The BBC covers how Latin American indigenous groups are using modern technology to coordinate their protests against modern technology. Specifically, they are using Skype and blogs to communicate with each other and share lessons learned from their protests against mining, dams, roads, and other infrastructure projects meant to power and connect the continent.
 
Some governments may see this sort of coordination among the indigenous as a threat (they are getting more effective protest methods), but that's really the wrong way to look at it. Individual indigenous cultures are being drastically reshaped by the process of communicating with modern tools and finding common cause with other groups thousands of miles away. Governments that help these groups connect and contribute to the debate about the balance between technology and traditional will likely find themselves in a far better negotiating position (plus a better understanding of indigenous demands) than governments that simply criticize and attempt to oppress and censor the movements.

– James Bosworth is a freelance writer and consultant who runs Bloggings by Boz.

Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.