Honduras elects first female president as rival concedes

After the ruling party in Honduras conceded defeat following contentious presidential elections, Xiomara Castro is set to become the country’s first female president. Hondurans and the international community alike welcomed a peaceful democratic transition. 

Moises Castillo/AP
Free Party presidential candidate Xiomara Castro supporters celebrate after general elections in Tegucigalpa, Honduras, Nov. 28, 2021. Ms. Castro promises to fight against poverty and to work with the U.S. to address the root causes of migration.

Honduras’ ruling party conceded defeat Tuesday in presidential elections held two days earlier, giving victory to leftist opposition candidate Xiomara Castro and easing fears of another contested vote and violent protests.

Tegucigalpa Mayor Nasry Asfura, presidential candidate of the National Party, said in a statement that he had personally congratulated Ms. Castro, despite only about half the voting tallies being counted from Sunday’s election.

The former first lady had 53% of the votes and Mr. Asfura 34%, with 52% of the tallies counted, according to the National Electoral Council. It has 30 days from the election to declare a winner.

Mr. Asfura said he had met with Ms. Castro and her family.

“Now I want to say it publicly,” the conservative candidate said. “That I congratulate her for her victory and as president elect, I hope that God illuminates and guides her so that her administration does the best for the benefit of all of us Hondurans, to achieve development and the desire for democracy.”

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken congratulated Ms. Castro minutes later.

“The United States congratulates the people of Honduras on their election and Xiomara Castro on her historic victory as Honduras’ first female president,” Mr. Blinken said in a statement. “We look forward to working with the next government of Honduras.”

Ms. Castro said via Twitter that Mr. Asfura had recognized her triumph. “People, I am not going to fail you!”

Mr. Asfura’s recognition of the outcome was a relief to many Hondurans who had feared a contested election after a debacle in 2017 led to street protests that left 23 people dead. Following that vote, the government imposed a curfew and only three weeks later declared now-outgoing President Juan Orlando Hernández the winner despite the Organization of American States observation mission calling for an election re-do.

Fearing a similar prolonged vote standoff and social unrest, many businesses in Honduras’ capital had boarded up their windows for this election.

Mabel Plata, a nursing student, said she appreciated Mr. Asfura’s recognition of the outcome. “It is a sign that he is a professional and polite person and went to see Xiomara for the good of the country.”

Ms. Plata couldn’t remember another who did the same. “Most always claim to be winners and it’s hard for them to accept defeat.”

Luis Guillermo Solís, former president of Costa Rica and head of the Organization of American States observation mission, said Tuesday in presenting the regional body’s preliminary report that Hondurans had overcome some technical difficulties to vote in great numbers.

“Honduran society voted with conviction, happiness and responsibility in a context marked by the pandemic and violence, which was denounced opportunely by the mission,” Mr. Solís said. He said the mission had not received reports of other irregularities or fraud.

Ms. Castro rode a wave of popular discontent with 12 years of National Party governance, which peaked in Mr. Hernández’s second term.

She will face major challenges as the Central American country’s president. Unemployment is above 10%, northern Honduras was devastated by two major hurricanes last year, and street gangs drag down the economy with their extortion rackets and violence, driving migration to the U.S.

On Tuesday, Vielka Yossira López folded jeans at a stand in the sprawling Comayaguela street market.

The single mother of two said she didn’t vote, but hoped for change.

“How am I going to lose a day of work to go vote,” Ms. López said. “I don’t work, I don’t eat.”

When Ms. López contracted COVID-19, she wasn’t able to work for two months. In that time she sold her bed, her refrigerator, television, and cellphone so she could buy food and diapers for her children, ages 3 and 6.

Ms. López makes 200 lempiras, about $8.25 per day. She pays $1.60 of that just for transportation to and from work each day. Her 6-year-old has been out of school for more than a year.

Ms. López is hopeful that when Ms. Castro becomes president she will bring with her a better understanding of what it takes to raise a family.

“Hopefully there will be a change by having a woman,” Ms. López said. “She has children and everything.”

Ms. Castro’s government could present challenges, but also opportunities for the Biden administration, which has sought to keep Mr. Hernández at arm’s length.

Many Castro supporters remember the U.S. government’s initial sluggishness in calling the ouster of Ms. Castro’s husband Manuel Zelaya from the presidency in 2009 a coup, and then proceeding to work closely with the National Party presidents who followed. And from the U.S. perspective, Washington remembers how Ms. Castro and Mr. Zelaya cozied up to then-Venezuela President Hugo Chávez.

Analysts say common ground between Ms. Castro and the U.S. government exists in at least three areas: immigration, drug trafficking, and corruption. And with tense relations prevailing between Washington and the leaders of El Salvador and Guatemala, the U.S. government could use a productive relationship with Honduras.

Despite opponents’ efforts to paint Ms. Castro as a communist, experts expect her to govern as a centrist with a desire to lift up Honduras’ poor while attracting foreign investment.

A speech Ms. Castro made to her Liberty and Re-foundation party in June remains one her clearest expressions of how she will navigate the U.S. relationship.

“In the first 100 days, we will execute and propose to the administration of President Joe Biden and Kamala Harris a plan to combat and address the true causes of migration,” Ms. Castro said.

Ms. Castro describes Hondurans’ emigration in terms of flight to escape inequality, corruption, poverty, and violence. That sounds a lot like Ms. Harris’ assessment of the root causes the Biden administration wants to focus U.S. aid on.

But Ms. Castro also puts some of the blame on the U.S. government.

“I believe the Biden administration has an enormous opportunity to address the issue of migration,” Ms. Castro said in the June speech. “First, recognizing that they have part of the responsibility for what happens in our country,” she added, noting the 2009 coup.

Ms. Castro has hammered the outgoing Hernández administration for corruption. It was Mr. Hernández’s administration that let the Organization of American States’ anti-corruption mission in Honduras expire in 2020 after its work had touched some of the National Party’s lawmakers for alleged misuse of public funds.

She has said she’s interested in having an international anti-corruption mission return to Honduras. That combined with a strong, independent attorney general, could begin to tackle one of the country’s most profound problems.

U.S. federal prosecutors have put corruption under the microscope in drug trafficking cases that have reached up to high-ranking Honduran politicians. The most notable was the conviction of Mr. Hernández’s brother, a former federal lawmaker, on drug trafficking charges that earned him a life sentence in the U.S.

In a speech late Sunday night, Ms. Castro told supporters: “Get out war! Get out hate! Get out death squads! Get out corruption! Get out drug trafficking and organized crime!”

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Honduras elects first female president as rival concedes
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today