Peru leftist Castillo claims election win over Fujimori

With all votes counted in Peru’s presidential election, socialist Pedro Castillo has narrowly claimed victory over conservative rival Keiko Fujimori. Ms. Fujimori has made allegations of fraud with little proof, while Mr. Castillo’s supporters have called on her to concede.

Angela Ponce/Reuters
Peru's presidential candidate Pedro Castillo gestures to supporters from the headquarters of the "Free Peru" party in Lima, Peru on June 15, 2021. Despite political rival Keiko Fujimori's allegations of fraud, international observers say the elections were transparent.

Peruvian socialist candidate Pedro Castillo claimed victory in the presidential election on Tuesday after clinging on to a narrow lead as the lengthy vote count ended, although his right-wing rival pledged to fight the result and has yet to concede.

Mr. Castillo ended the count 44,058 votes ahead of Keiko Fujimori, who has made allegations of fraud with little proof and has tried to get some votes annulled. The result of the June 6 ballot has not been formally announced by electoral authorities, but Mr. Castillo hailed the win on Twitter.

“A new time has begun,” Mr. Castillo wrote, alongside a picture of himself with arms raised, the word “President” in large font, and his campaign slogan: “No more poor in a rich country.”

He also updated his Twitter profile to include “President-elect of the Republic of Peru (2021-2026).”

The abrupt rise of the former teacher has rattled Peru’s political and business elite and could have a major impact on the vital mining industry in the world’s No. 2 copper producer, with Mr. Castillo planning sharp tax hikes on the sector.

Ms. Fujimori, addressing supporters at a rally in downtown Lima on Tuesday, pledged to keep fighting and “defend Peru’s democracy.” She hoped the result would swing her way once ballots that her party is seeking to annul had been checked.

“Today a result has come out, yes, a result from the ONPE [electoral body] count, but the most important thing is the evaluation of the ballot boxes,” she said. “We trust the authorities, yes, but we trust more in the popular will.”

Mr. Castillo’s Free Peru party has rejected accusations of fraud and international observers in Lima have stated that the elections were transparent.

Will of the people

Mr. Castillo had vowed earlier in the day he would not allow rivals to deny the will of the people and overturn the election, which has seen supporters on both sides take to the streets in recent days.

The son of peasant farmers, Mr. Castillo had 50.125% of the votes while Ms. Fujimori, the eldest daughter of imprisoned former president Alberto Fujimori, had 49.875%.

Mr. Castillo told reporters at the Lima headquarters of his party that he would respect electoral authorities and urged them to end the uncertainty by confirming the result quickly.

“We’re not going to allow an oppressed people to continue to be discriminated against for more years,” Mr. Castillo said. “Things have been put on the table democratically, and there needs to be a democratic way out.”

Election observers said it could take days or even weeks for the authorities to deliberate the legal challenges and to declare a winner.

Peruvians who had cast their votes for Mr. Castillo have grown impatient.

Ricarte Vasquez, originally from northern Cajamarca, called the deadlock “shameful” as he was selling a breakfast snack of fried sweet potato and yuca on a busy Lima junction where mini buses pick up passengers.

“If Keiko had won, it’d already be decided,” Mr. Vasquez said. “I voted not only for a change in the government but also for a change in the country.”

Mr. Vasquez said he hoped the situation for informal workers like himself, many of whom were hit hard during a months-long lockdown to curb the spread of the coronavirus, would change with Mr. Castillo as president.

Luz Maria Quispe, originally from Cusco, said she had also voted for Mr. Castillo and did not believe fraud claims.

“We want this change for Peru,” she said, standing in front of a statue of the Virgin Mary in a Lima park where she and the elderly person she was caring for had stopped to pray.

“What I’m asking Señora Keiko Fujimori is that she now accepts defeat: the people have decided.”

Ms. Quispe said she had studied to become a nurse but was forced to quit because she could no longer afford tuition.

Mr. Castillo has galvanized rural and poorer voters who feel left behind in the country’s economic growth. His rise could portend a swing to the left in Brazil, Chile, and Colombia, who will vote for new leaders this year and next.

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Peru leftist Castillo claims election win over Fujimori
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today