Bolivia's exit polls: Former Morales minister poised to win

Socialist Luis Arce is expected to win the tense do-over of Bolivia's disputed 2019 election. His campaign was supported by the country's polarizing former president Evo Morales, and his likely victory is seen as a boon to the region's beleaguered left.

|
Juan Karita/AP
Supporters of Luis Arce, president-elect and member of the Movement Towards Socialism party, celebrate as they claim victory after general elections in La Paz, Bolivia, Oct. 19, 2020. As president, Mr. Arce will contend with a pandemic and Bolivia's high poverty rate.

Evo Morales’ party claimed victory in Bolivia’s presidential election as official results trickled in from Sunday’s high-stakes redo of last year’s annulled ballot that saw the leftist leader resign and flee the country.

More than nine hours after polls closed, barely 6% of all ballot boxes had been counted and they showed Mr. Morales’ handpicked successor, Luis Arce, trailing a conservative rival.

But with a private quick count of sampled polling stations favoring Mr. Arce by a wide margin, even interim President Jeanine Áñez – an archrival of Mr. Morales – recognized that the socialist movement looked set to return to power in what looked to be a major jolt to South America’s beleaguered left.

“I congratulate the winners and I ask them to govern thinking in Bolivia and in our democracy,” Ms. Áñez said on Twitter.

Bolivians have long been accustomed to quick preliminary results in presidential elections. But after allegations of fraud and days of unrest marred last year’s ballot, newly installed electoral authorities had been appealing for patience, reminding voters that they have up to five days to declare a winner.

While voting was peaceful, the long wait Sunday night for results fueled speculation that something was awry. Adding to intrigue, publication of two exit polls was also withheld after private pollsters said they didn’t trust their own survey results.

Mr. Morales broke the tense silence by declaring Mr. Arce the winner. Later, two pollsters said a quick count of official tally sheets at select polling stations showed Mr. Arce had garnered more than 50% of the votes, compared to 31% for former President Carlos Mesa, the top finisher of four rival candidates.

“We’ve recovered our democracy,” Mr. Morales said in brief remarks from exile in Argentina. “Lucho will be our president.”

Appearing a few minutes later, Mr. Arce appealed for calm, saying he would seek to form a government of national unity.

“I think the Bolivian people want to retake the path we were on,” Mr. Arce declared around midnight surrounded by a small group of supporters, some of them in traditional Andean dress in honor of the country’s Indigenous roots.

The early official results favored Mr. Mesa, a former journalist and historian, with 49% compared to 33% for Mr. Arce.

Prior to voting, polls showed Mr. Arce ahead but lacking enough votes to avoid a November runoff, where conservative voters would’ve likely rallied behind Mr. Mesa. To win in the first round, a candidate needs more than 50% of the vote, or 40% with a lead of at least 10 percentage points over the second-place candidate.

Mr. Arce, who oversaw a surge in growth and reduction in poverty as Mr. Morales’ economy minister for more than a decade, would face an uphill battle trying to jump-start growth this time.

The coronavirus, which led authorities to postpone Sunday’s election twice, has hit the impoverished, landlocked Bolivia harder than almost any other country on a per capita basis. Nearly 8,400 of its 11.6 million people have died of COVID-19.

Mr. Arce also faces the challenge of emerging from the long shadow of his former boss, who remains polarizing but whose support enabled the low-key, UK-educated economist to mount a strong campaign.

Mr. Morales was barred from running in Sunday’s election, even for a seat in congress, and faces prosecution on what are seen as trumped-up charges of terrorism if he returns home. Few expect the sometimes-irascible politician to sit by idly in a future Arce government.

Bolivia, once one of the most politically volatile countries in Latin America, experienced a rare period of stability under Mr. Morales, the country’s first Indigenous president.

A boyhood llama herder who became prominent leading a coca grower’s union, Mr. Morales had been immensely popular while overseeing an export-led economic surge. But support was eroding due to his reluctance to leave power, increasing authoritarian impulses, and a series of corruption scandals.

He shrugged aside a public vote that had set term limits, and competed in the October 2019 presidential vote, which he claimed to have narrowly won outright. But a lengthy pause in reporting results fed suspicions of fraud and nationwide protests followed, leading to the deaths of at least 36 people.

When police and military leaders suggested he leave, Mr. Morales resigned and fled the country. Mr. Morales called his ouster a coup and a non-elected conservative government has ruled since.

Sunday’s vote was an attempt to reset Bolivia’s democracy. All seats in the 136-member Legislative Assembly were also up for grabs and expected to echo the results of the presidential race.

“Bolivia’s new executive and legislative leaders will face daunting challenges in a polarized country, ravaged by COVID-19, and hampered by endemically weak institutions,” said the Washington Office on Latin America, a Washington-based human rights advocacy organization.

Mr. Morales led Bolivia from 2006 until 2019 and was the last survivor of the so-called “pink wave” of leftist leaders that swept into power across South American during a commodities boom.

Although outrage with corruption fueled a resurgence in right-wing politics, notably in Brazil, Mr. Arce’s victory is bound to reenergize the left, whose anthem of economic justice has broad appeal in a region where poverty is expected to surge to 37% this year, according to the United Nations.

In the end, Mr. Arce may have benefited from overreach and a series of errors by Mr. Morales’ enemies. Ms. Áñez, a conservative senator, proclaimed herself interim president amid last year’s tumult and was accepted by the courts. Her administration, despite lacking a majority in congress, set about trying to prosecute Mr. Morales and key aides while undoing his policies, prompting more unrest and polarization.

“A lot of people said if this is the alternative being offered, I prefer to go back to the way things were,” said Andres Gomez, a political scientist based in La Paz.

Ms. Áñez dropped out at as a candidate for Sunday’s presidential election while trailing badly in polls. That boosted Mr. Mesa, who governed Bolivia following the resignation in 2003 of former President Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada amid widespread protests.

The Trump administration, which celebrated Mr. Morales’ departure as a watershed moment for democracy in Latin America, has been more cautious as Mr. Morales’ handpicked successor surged in the polls. A senior State Department official this week said the U.S. is ready to work with whomever Bolivians select in a free and fair vote.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP writer Paola Flores contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Bolivia's exit polls: Former Morales minister poised to win
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2020/1019/Bolivia-s-exit-polls-Former-Morales-minister-poised-to-win
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe