In blow to Trudeau, court stops Canada pipeline project

The Pacific pipeline would allow Canada to diversify oil markets and increase exports to Asia. But the court said the energy board's review was too flawed and that the federal government failed to engage in meaningful consultations with First Nations before approving it.

Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press/AP
Coldwater Indian band Chief Lee Spahan raises an eagle feather after responding to a Federal Court of Appeal ruling on the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion, during a news conference in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Aug. 30, 2018. In a unanimous decision by a panel of three judges, the court says the National Energy Board's review of the project was so flawed that the federal government could not rely on it as a basis for its decision to approve the expansion.

Canada's Federal Court of Appeal on Thursday halted the contentious Trans Mountain pipeline expansion that would nearly triple the flow of oil from the Alberta oil sands to the Pacific Coast – a setback that comes just as the government is buying the project.

The court ordered the country's National Energy Board to redo its review of the pipeline, saying the original study was flawed and lacked adequate consultations with First Nations peoples.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government approved Trans Mountain in 2016 and was so determined to see it built that it announced plans this spring to buy the pipeline. The sale will be finalized as early as Friday.

It faces stiff environmental opposition from British Columbia's provincial government and activists. Houston-based Kinder Morgan earlier halted essential spending on the project and said it would cancel it altogether if the national and provincial governments could not guarantee it.

In a written decision, the court said the energy board's review was so flawed that the federal government could not rely on it to approve the pipeline. The court concluded the federal government failed in its duty to engage in meaningful consultations with First Nations before approving it.

"Meaningful consultation is not intended simply to allow indigenous peoples "to blow off steam," the decision said.

The court decision is a blow to Mr. Trudeau, whose government is having a bad week after Canada was left out of new free trade deal with the US and Mexico. Talks to include Canada are now taking place in Washington.

"Now the incompetent Trudeau gov't owns a pipeline it can't build," opposition deputy Conservative leader Lisa Raitt tweeted.

Kinder Morgan shareholders voted overwhelmingly, 99 percent, to approve the $4.5 billion Canadian (US$3.4 billion) sale of the pipeline to the government shortly after the court decision was announced.

Canadian Finance Minister Bill Morneau didn't say whether the government would appeal the court decision, but said it will review the decision to ensure the environment is protected and that it meets obligations to consult with indigenous peoples.

"While we want to make sure the project proceeds, we want to make sure it proceeds in the right way," Mr. Morneau said.

He said he expects the Kinder Morgan sale to be finalized on Friday and called it a good financial decision. He said the pipeline is critically important as Canada looks to diversify its oil exports.

The court ruling "is an incredible blow, especially with the government on the hook for buying it," said Nelson Wiseman, a political science professor at the University of Toronto.

"The government is deeply invested in this and it is going to cost the government a fortune."

Trudeau approved the expansion, arguing that it was "economically necessary," and it enabled him to overcome opposition to a carbon tax plan that will help Canada cut its greenhouse emissions.

Alberta Premier Rachel Notley said her province is now pulling out of Trudeau's carbon tax plan until the pipeline is back on track. Notley said the federal government needs to appeal the court's decision to the Supreme Court and call an emergency session of Parliament.

The pipeline would allow Canada to diversify oil markets and vastly increase exports to Asia, where it could command a higher price. Canada has the world's third largest oil reserves, but 99 percent of its exports now go to refiners in the United States, where limits on pipeline and refinery capacity mean Canadian oil sells at a discount.

Analysts have said China is eager to get access to Canada's oil, but largely gave up hope that a pipeline to the Pacific Coast would be built.

The court decision is a victory for indigenous leaders and environmentalists, who have pledged to do whatever necessary to thwart the pipeline, including chaining themselves to construction equipment. The Trans Mountain expansion would cause tanker traffic to balloon from about 60 to more than 400 vessels annually as the pipeline flow increases from 300,000 to 890,000 barrels per day.

Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee, an opponent of the project, said he was pleased that the court found there are serious impacts that have not yet been full considered.

Many indigenous people see the 620 miles of new pipeline as a threat to their lands, echoing concerns raised by Native Americans about the Keystone XL project in the US. Many in Canada say it also raises broader environmental concerns by enabling increased development of the carbon-heavy oil sands.

"This is a major victory for my community," said Coldwater Indian Band Chief Lee Spahan. "The court has stepped in where Canada has failed to protect and respect our rights and our water."

Stewart Phillip, the grand chief of the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs, said the ruling took him aback. "I was expecting to be talking about the need to carry on the battle," he said. "I am absolutely elated."

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to In blow to Trudeau, court stops Canada pipeline project
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today