Tony Saca, former Salvadoran president, arrested on corruption charges

Tony Saca arrested: Three former presidents of El Salvador have now faced investigation on similar charges, reflecting a broader stand against corruption throughout Latin America.

Dario Lopez-Mills/AP/File
On, June 1, 2009. his last day as President of El Salvador, Tony Saca and his wife, Ana Ligia de Saca, arrive at the inauguration ceremony of the new president of El Salvador, Mauricio Funes in San Salvador.

The former president of El Salvador, Tony Saca, was arrested Saturday on charges ranging from money laundering to illicit enrichment. Six other government officials from his time in office were also arrested as part of the corruption probe.

Mr. Saca, who held office from 2004 to 2009, is the third former president of the Central American nation to have been subjected to recent investigations in relation to corruption.

The pursuit of justice against those accused of abusing their power reflects a wider trend throughout Latin America, where the public is losing patience with corruption and demanding greater accountability and transparency.

Saca, along with two other high-ranking officials from his former government, is under investigation because he has apparently been unable to explain the origins of $5 million in assets he acquired during his presidency. He was arrested at his son's wedding.

Another of those arrested, Saca’s former private secretary, Elmer Charlaix, faces similar charges over $5.8 million in private bank accounts.

Former President Mauricio Funes, Saca’s successor, in power until 2014, is also being investigated over corruption charges and has taken asylum in Nicaragua. Francisco Flores, Saca’s predecessor, died in January while awaiting trial on charges of diverting $15 million of aid money for earthquake victims.

El Salvador is far from alone in Latin America in seeking to uncover public corruption and hold perpetrators to account, no matter their position or social standing. The trend suggests that a new stand is being taken in the region, a period in which corruption by public officials receives far less tolerance. 

Corruption scandals have exploded across Latin America in recent years,” wrote Kevin Casas-Zamora, former vice president of Costa Rica, and Miguel Carter, director of a political research center in Paraguay, in April. “From Brazil to Mexico, revelations of corruption have led to large demonstrations, prosecutions of government officials and business executives at the highest level, and acute political crises.”

Perhaps the most widely publicized of these cases in recent months has been the two-pronged investigation in Brazil, exposing pervasive political corruption in relation to the nation’s oil giant, Petrobras, while also impeaching the country’s president, Dilma Rousseff, on unrelated charges.

Yet some analysts point to examples in countries with less deeply-rooted democracies and recent histories of civil conflict, such as El Salvador and Guatemala, as examples of just how far this movement against corruption is spreading.

“It’s one thing for Brazil or Chile, with a longer history of strong institutions, to investigate the powerful and put them in jail,” wrote Brian Winter, editor-in-chief of Americas Quarterly, earlier this year. “But Guatemala? A country that just 20 years ago was in the throes of civil war?”

And what is it driving this shift? Surveys, such as Vanderbilt University’s AmericasBarometer, indicate that corruption itself may actually be on the decline, driven by changes in the “social, political and economic context in which corruption takes place,” as Mr. Casas-Zamora and Mr. Carter put it.

They go on to list factors such as the explosion of social media, a more politically active middle class, and a growing perception that institutions have been rigged in favor of elites.

“Something truly historic is happening in Latin America today,” writes Mr. Winter. “These changes are occurring even in the hemisphere’s most fragile countries.”

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Tony Saca, former Salvadoran president, arrested on corruption charges
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today