Colombia, FARC to sign peace deal, ending five decades of war

Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos and FARC leader Timochenko are set to sign a historic peace deal Monday, ending a 52-year conflict that has killed a quarter of a million people.

Ricardo Mazalan/AP
Former FARC guerrilla Diomedes holds the baby of a visiting relative of a fellow rebel of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, FARC, in the Yari Plains, southern Colombia, Sunday, Sept. 25, 2016. President Juan Manuel Santos and FARC leader Rodrigo Londono, alias Timochenko, are expected to sign a peace accord to end more than five decades of conflict Sept. 26 in the Caribbean city of Cartagena. (AP Photo/)

Colombia is to take another key step toward peace on Monday, as President Juan Manuel Santos and leader of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), Rodrigo Londoño Echeverri aka Timochenko, sign a peace deal.

The ceremony, taking place in the country’s coastal city of Cartagena, is scheduled to be witnessed by up to 15 Latin American presidents, with UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and US Secretary of State John Kerry also scheduled to attend. It brings the country to the cusp of a peace that will end half a century of conflict, responsible for the death of a quarter of a million people, described by President Santos as ‘the oldest, the cruelest’ conflict in the Western hemisphere.

“War is always more costly than peace,” Santos told the BBC. “A country at war for 50 years is a country that has destroyed many of its values.”

There is now real hope that peace can endure between the Colombian authorities and the country’s biggest rebel group, allowing a reclamation of those values, as well as a boost to the nation’s – and its people’s – prosperity.

Hurdles and concerns remain, not least a plebiscite on Oct. 2, in which the country’s people must vote on whether to accept the deal. Many harbor reservations that the terms are too lenient for the rebels, replacing jail time with development work for those who confess to their abuses.

Yet polls indicate that the accord will pass the people’s judgement. Moreover, in spite of the shortcomings highlighted by critics, the process has earned praise as a groundbreaking approach to conflict resolution, particularly with regard to its involvement of victims.

“I don't think there's ever been negotiations where victims were speaking face to face with perpetrators,” Kristian Herbolzheimer, a conflict resolution expert with Conciliation Resources, a UK-based peace consultancy, told The Christian Science Monitor in August.

Even if this peace agreement is implemented, however, other threats to the country’s security remain. Talks between the government and a smaller rebel group, the National Liberation Army, have stalled of late, though a successful conclusion to the FARC’s negotiations could reinvigorate that process.

A bigger obstacle for the government, perhaps, is the multitude of criminal enterprises managed by the FARC, including its domination of the illicit drug trade. When its fighters lay down their arms and enter the rehabilitation process outlined in the agreement, they may leave a vacuum that others will eagerly seek to fill.

“Colombia’s conflict has a multitude of actors, and the FARC is just one,” wrote Elizabeth Dickinson in Foreign Policy. “Even if the guerrillas disband quickly and quietly, their illicit economy – and the bloodshed it generates – is too lucrative and tempting to disappear anytime soon.”

Yet whatever challenges may lie ahead, there can be little doubt that peace between the government and the FARC will represent an enormous boon for Colombia. In honor of that fact, the ceremony taking place in Cartagena will be steeped in symbolism, the 2,500 guests invited to wear white as an ode to peace, and the president signing the deal with a pen made from the casing of a shell used in combat.

“The signature of the deal is simply the end of the conflict,” Santos told the BBC. “Then the hard work starts: reconstructing our country.”

Material from the Associated Press and Reuters was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.