Has Colombia reached a peace deal with FARC?

Peace negotiations have concluded, according to local media. Colombia may be just weeks away from the signing of a historic accord.

Fernando Vergara/AP
Rebels of the 32nd Front of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, laugh during a break, at their camp in the southern jungles of Putumayo, Colombia, Aug. 11, 2016. As Colombia’s half-century conflict winds down, with the signing of a peace deal imminent, thousands of FARC rebels are emerging from their hideouts and preparing for a life without arms.

After four long years, representatives of Colombia’s government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) rebels say they’ve all but concluded negotiations over a peace deal that would bring a five-decade war to a formal end.

On Tuesday night, rebel commander Timoleón “Timochenko” Jiménez wrote on Twitter, “We’re at the doorstep of important news that brings us closer to the final accord.”

After the government published a photo of negotiators from both sides under a banner reading, “The day is coming. We’re on the road to peace,” speculation grew that an announcement could come as soon as Wednesday evening, according to the Associated Press.

With negotiations ended, rebel leaders must return to Colombia for what would be the group’s final conference as combatants, to inform their troops on the details of the accord, according to El Tiempo. The troops must then ratify them before leaders join Colombian president Juan Manuel Santos to sign the final deal.

The Colombian public will also need to ratify the deal through a simple plebiscite – a “yes” or “no” vote on whether to accept the accord. There’s no guarantee of it passing: In a mid-August poll, a razor-thin majority of respondents said they would vote to accept it, but other polls from this month show “no” voters prevailing.

But even as Colombia awaits final word on its peace deal, the nation has been inching its way toward a more peaceful society overall, as Howard LaFranchi reported in a cover story for The Christian Science Monitor in March: 

[A]s the country moves tantalizingly close to putting an end to its long war ... Colombia is a very different place. Killings, kidnappings, and disappearances are all down sharply: Murders, which totaled 26,250 in 2001, fell by more than half to 12,750 in 2014. Bombings, field battles, and massacres are no longer daily front-page fare. With security reestablished in many places, notably cities such as the capital, Bogotá, and the Millennial-cool Medellín, private investment is flooding in and the middle class has expanded. 

Only if the public votes in favor of the deal, may the hardest work – and the greatest risks to an enduring social peace – begin. As The Christian Science Monitor noted in June, the Colombian government is signing onto a huge new raft of obligations in exchange for peace.

The FARC … is reportedly more worried about another precedent: The last time they put down their weapons, in 1980s, thousands of members of their affiliated political party were murdered in retribution.

Under the terms of the eventually-hoped-for peace accord, the FARC is supposed to help the government eradicate coca crops. In return, the government has to effectively build a modern state in remote areas, committing to development projects such as building roads, and creating more equitable land ownership for farmers. 

In June, the Monitor’s editorial board highlighted the unusual approach to peace pioneered by the two sides in the conflict. Even as armed conflict between them continued to smolder, the government and the rebels worked toward peace by negotiating agreements on a series of specific issues:

There’s a lesson for other world conflicts in this ‘peace first’ approach. It is that peace must be seen not merely as the absence of war but as a tangible reality. For Colombia that reality has been designed through difficult talks to include interim pacts on truth-telling about past abuses, a measure of justice for victims, an eventual coexistence between old foes, and broad economic and social reforms.

It may sound odd, but the negotiators describe the approach this way: ‘Fight the war as if there is no peace process and conduct the peace process as if there is no war.’ In other words, protect the peace process from flare-ups in the war that might derail it.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Has Colombia reached a peace deal with FARC?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today