Urs Flueeler/Keystone/AP/File
The teams of Russia, New Zealand, Unite States, Britain and Canada (from front) start at the Women's Eight Final race at the Rowing World Cup on Lake Rotsee in Lucerne, Switzerland in May 2016. The Americans have won 10 consecutive world and Olympic titles in the event, a winning streak that is unmatched in most sports.

On her shoulders: record number of female Olympians expected in Rio

Equality in representation between men and women in the Games has come a long way, for some countries more than others.

When the final landings were stuck and the finish lines were crossed in the London 2012 Summer Olympic Games, American athletes had won more medals than those of any other country.

And the majority of those medals, gold and otherwise, were won by women.

The 2012 Games marked the first time that the US team had sent more women than men to the Olympics. When the international competition kicks off this week in Rio de Janeiro, that ante will be upped again as the United States sends 292 female athletes, the largest women’s team ever fielded by any country in the Games.

The groundbreaking US team may be part a broader distinction for these Olympics, which the International Olympic Committee hopes will have the highest proportion of female participants ever fielded, beating out London where 44 percent of the competitors were female. That uptick in women competitors is part of a larger landscape of evolving gender equality in the Games, which remain one of the few platforms where female athletes get to see their names in lights.

The Olympics has come a long way when it comes to embracing female athletes. A grand total of zero female athletes competed at the first modern Games in 1896 (founder Pierre de Coubertin reportedly thought female participation would be "impractical, uninteresting, unaesthetic, and incorrect.") In the following Games of 1900, 22 of the nearly 1,000 athletes were women. They competed in tennis, sailing, croquet, equestrianism, and golf. Two women took home gold medals, one for a mixed-gender sailing team (Switzerland) and the other for singles tennis (Britain).

In 1928, track and field was added for women, but after controversial reports depicted several of the women passing out after the 800-meter event the Olympic committee banned women from running anything longer than 200 meters. That ban would last until 1960, while the marathon would not be added until 1984. Then in 1991 the International Olympic Committee decided that all new sports wishing to be included on the program must feature both men's and women's events.

However the 2012 London Games were the first where women competed in every single sport in the competition. This was not the same for men, who do not have an option for synchronized swimming or rhythmic gymnastics. Those games were also the first where every nation was represented by at least one female athlete (a first for Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Brunei); this year Saudi Arabia will bring two women, while Qatar and Brunei will remain represented by one each.

The 292 women who will represent the US in the 2016 Games stands in contrast to those countries, and American fans are looking to see the female teams continue to dominate in events where they hold serious winning streaks.

Basketball is one such sport: Team USA team has won 41 consecutive Olympic tournament games and is pursuing a sixth consecutive gold medal. Women’s soccer is another. The US team is both the defending Olympic gold medalist and FIFA World Cup champion. The women’s rowing eight team has not lost an Olympic or world championship title in a decade; and the US women’s artistic and diverse gymnastics team has won every world and Olympic title since 2011.

Individual stars are also drawing buzz, such as Katie Ledecky, who has the 11 fastest performances in the 800 meter freestyle, outstripping the famous Michael Phelps in records, according to The Wall Street Journal.

"We mass-produce athletes," Donna Lopiano, an expert on women's athletics and gender equality told the Journal Sentinel. "When you think about it, we have probably the largest mass of women in the world playing sports."

Ms. Lopiano believes that the prominence of the female American athlete is related to the linkage between sports and educational institutions, which must follow Title IX regulations for equality between genders in all aspects of education, including athletics.

While attention given to women's sports in mainstream American culture is subsumed by coverage of men's sports, the Olympics has become a platform where women athletes can find national and international spotlight, said Cheryl Cooky, president of the North American Society for the Sociology of Sport, in an interview with the Journal Sentinel.

"The Olympics show us that women aren't just on the sidelines, but can be the stars of the show."

Material from the Thomson Reuters Foundation was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to On her shoulders: record number of female Olympians expected in Rio
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today