Minimum-wage debate roils Mexico, where rock-bottom pay rules

Mexico is both home to one of the richest men in the world and one of the lowest minimum wages in Latin America. Mexico City's mayor is pushing for an increase, but some worry it will have detrimental effects on the national economy. 

Edgard Garrido/REUTERS
A man carries packages from shopping in downtown Mexico City February 14, 2013.

Mexico has the 14th largest economy in the world, a humming manufacturing sector, a newly opened energy sector that’s drawing worldwide interest, and, at $144 a month, likely the lowest minimum wage in Latin America.

“It’s ridiculously low,” says Jonathan Heath, an independent economist.

The wages that Mexican employers pay those on the lowest rung of the country’s $1.3 trillion economy have fueled a national debate this month, drawing demands by parties both to the left and right of the ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party to impose an increase.

It’s a debate that highlights the inequalities in Mexico – home to a tycoon who competes for the title of world’s richest man – and the struggles of a nation where more than half of workers toil outside the formal economy in gray areas where a minimum wage is merely a theoretical notion.

Banging the drum for increasing the minimum wage is Mexico City Mayor Miguel Mancera, a leftist politician with a nose for higher office. Mr. Mancera claimed this month that the minimum wage has lost 77 percent of its purchasing power in the past 35 years, eroded by inflation.

“This means that in Mexico City, we can only acquire 23 percent of what we could buy in the 1970s,” Mancera told a news conference Aug. 5.

In a move to boost the fortunes of his Party of the Democratic Revolution, Mancera called on national legislators to raise the minimum wage next year from 67.3 pesos a day to between 80 and 87 pesos a day – $6.10 to $6.60 – enough to provide for what a government council that measures poverty says are the essentials for survival in daily food intake and transportation to and from work.

Labor Secretary Alfonso Navarrete Prida called the proposal dangerous, saying it could hobble economic growth, spark inflation and stall efforts to increase productivity.

As it is now, Mexico’s minimum wage stands below nearly all countries in Latin America, including small economies of Central America. Panama sets a $640 monthly minimum wage. In Costa Rica it’s $492 and in Nicaragua, $166.

Brazil, which has the largest economy in Latin America, offers workers a $301 minimum monthly salary. Monthly minimum wages for other countries are: Argentina, $432.50; Bolivia, $211; Chile, $386; Colombia, $321; Ecuador, $340; Peru, $265; Paraguay, $429; and Uruguay, $375.

“We are competing with Bolivia and Nicaragua,” says Gerardo Esquivel, an economist with a Harvard Ph.D. who works at the Colegio de Mexico, a research and teaching institution.

The debate over the minimum wage has touched on Mexico’s Constitution – which guarantees a dignified salary – as well as everything from inflation to mortgages, which are pegged to the minimum wage in at least one subsidized federal program.

Article 123 of the Constitution, written in the aftermath of a revolution a century ago that enshrined the role of workers in the nation, says the minimum wage “shall be enough to fulfill normal family needs from a material, social, and cultural point of view.”

“No one can seriously think the minimum wage is OK,” Mr. Heath says. “Either we change the Constitution and don’t do anything to the minimum wage, or we change the minimum wage.”

About 6.6 million Mexicans in the 51.8 million labor force earn the minimum wage each month. Most of them, though, toil in the informal sector, which President Enrique Peña Nieto said last year employed 3 out of 5 workers. Only about 1.2 million minimum-wage workers are in formal jobs, in which they’re registered with the government and protected by labor codes.

Even though the minimum wage affects relatively few workers, the government has held it down over decades partly through support for sham unions that support business and political interests.

Leaders of the huge Mexican Workers Confederation and the Confederation of Workers and Peasants signed a statement Aug. 12 along with industrialists, business owners, and Labor Secretary Navarrete urging any discussion of a minimum wage increase to be “public, serious and responsible.”

“Mexico has been brilliant at shifting the adjustment burden downward,” says Carol Wise, an expert in Latin American economics at the University of Southern California. “The bottom 40 percent of the population has gotten the shaft.”

Ms. Wise says raising wages in Mexico “would be part of upward mobility” and dismissed criticism that it would increase inflation slightly. “Who says inflation has to be 4 percent?” Wise says. “I think single-digit is fine.”

Among those supporting the increase in the minimum wage are leaders of the center-right National Action Party, which governed Mexico from 2000 to 2012. The party has fallen on hard times, and analysts say the move was a grab for public support.

A blogger on the news and opinion portal, Antonio Martinez, wrote Aug. 20 about how he lived for three days on the minimum wage.

“It was enough to eat and for nothing else,” Martinez wrote. “At the end, I realized that I would not be able to pay the bills for telephone, gas and electricity . . . much less rent in the area where I live.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to