Will US sanctions offer Venezuela's Maduro a helping hand?

The US imposed visa bans on more than 20 Venezuelan officials, citing alleged human rights abuses. The timing of the sanctions could bolster President Maduro's anti-US credentials.

|
Miraflores Palace/REUTERS
Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro (r.) shakes hands with Paraguay's President Horacio Cartes at Miraflores Palace in Caracas July 29, 2014.

The US State Department's travel ban on 24 high-ranking Venezuelan officials is supposed to send a message of zero tolerance for human rights abuses. But analysts warn that the sanctions, announced Wednesday, could ultimately strengthen the hand of President Nicolás Maduro’s government. 

While Congress has for months been mulling sanctions over Venezuela's suppression of anti-government protests, the Obama administration appeared to be holding out hopes that peace talks between Maduro and his opponents would bear fruit. Protests erupted earlier this year over soaring crime and economic distress. 

The US and Venezuela have a rocky history: The two countries haven't shared ambassadors since 2010, and former President Hugo Chávez often blamed the "imperialists" to the north for many of the country's woes. President Maduro has also exploited anti-US sentiment to score political points, while claiming that the demonstrations are a front for his foes to topple a Socialist government. 

"[The sanctions] provide yet another cover-up," for the Maduro administration, says Carlos Romero, a professor of international relations at Central University of Venezuela. Far from pushing the president towards compromise, the sanctions could help him rally his base, Mr. Romero warns. "This is a victory for the radicals."

The US hasn't named the blacklisted Venezuelan officials due to visa record confidentiality. A State Department official said the list includes cabinet members, presidential advisers, police, and military officials.

'Fractured' US policy?

The sanctions come on the heels of a diplomatic spat over the attempted extradition of former Venezuela Gen. Hugo Carvajal, accused of trafficking thousands of pounds of cocaine to the US. Carvajal was arrested last week in Aruba at the behest of the US government, only to be released days later.

In the Venezuelan telling, the timing of the sanctions speaks to US frustration over its declining influence in the region and merely scapegoats Venezuela.

At a press conference yesterday, Foreign Minister Elías Jaua called the sanctions "a desperate cry from a nation that realizes the world is changing." He added: "The US is retaliating against the role Venezuela is playing in shaping a new Latin America."

The unrest last spring left more than 40 people dead, hundreds injured, and dozens jailed, including opposition leader, Leopoldo López, who had rallied thousands of Venezuelans. While the strife in the streets has largely subsided, many US lawmakers still favor stronger action against the Venezuelan government.

"The timing is perplexing," admits Cynthia Arnson, director of the Latin American program at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. "Yet the pressure to act [from Washington and the international community] is ongoing."

The sanctions may ease congressional pressure on the Obama administration, but some observers warn that it could still backfire.

"It reveals the fractured nature of Washington's policy toward Venezuela," says Alexander Preiss, a research associate at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs. "To some extent, it will certainly be counterproductive."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Will US sanctions offer Venezuela's Maduro a helping hand?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Americas/2014/0731/Will-US-sanctions-offer-Venezuela-s-Maduro-a-helping-hand
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe