What do 'social inclusion' rankings tell us about the child migrant crisis?

For the third year, America's Quarterly has ranked Latin American countries and the United States based on social inclusion. How do these countries stack up?

Least inclusive: Honduras and Guatemala

Like last year, the Central American neighbors were ranked the least inclusive. The countries are two of the principal senders of the young migrants who are causing a humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexican border.

Guatemala came in last place. It ranked near the bottom on economic growth and spending on social programs and finished last for women’s rights. The country, which has long suffered high levels of inequality, received low marks for its treatments of minorities, a group largely made up by indigenous Maya.

Honduras, surprisingly, had one of the highest percentages of GDP spent on social programs, largely because of its education programs. That does not help children stay in school, however, as fewer than half of young males were enrolled in secondary school. The country also saw a deterioration of civil rights, compared with last year. 

4 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.