Brazil and Mexico face off – at the World Cup and in the region

Latin America's two largest economies battle it out at the World Cup today. On and off the pitch, Mexico has surprised Brazil in recent years.

Laszlo Balogh/Reuters
Mexican fans gather outside the stadium prior to the 2014 World Cup Group A soccer match between Brazil and Mexico in Fortaleza today.

Brazil and Mexico face off today in the World Cup rematch of their 2012 Olympic finals showdown, when El Tri upset Seleção to win gold.

But more than just a chance for Brazil to redeem itself on its home turf, today’s match in Fortaleza brings together Latin America’s two largest economies at a moment when they’re moving in different directions economically and politically.

“Economic expectations in both countries are exactly the opposite of their outlook at the World Cup,” says Jorge Gonzalez, a Mexico-born economics professor and dean of Occidental College in Los Angeles, who is in Brazil for the soccer tournament. "The Mexican economy is growing, its middle class has been expanding, poverty is going down, and politicians have done what is necessary to enact long overdue structural reforms.

"Brazil on the other hand seems to be going backwards in many ways,” Mr. Gonzalez says.

On the pitch, Brazil’s style of play is marked by speed and creativity in fast-flowing attacks, led by flashy young forward Neymar, complete with his mohawk and major sponsors. Mexico’s more structured and organized approach to soccer is led by the more opportunistic Javier Hernández, known as Chicharito.

Similarly, differences are apparent in how the nations approach government and markets. In the left corner is Brazil with its greater government control and membership in protectionist trade bloc Mercosur. In the right corner is the more market-friendly Mexico, aligned in the liberal Pacific Alliance trade bloc.

Brazil’s persistently high inflation and low consumer confidence have led to an increasingly unstable economy ahead of its presidential election in October. And political instability has been exacerbated by a year of social protests calling for greater investment in public services, which were fueled by frustration over the World Cup’s estimated $11.3 billion price tag. The World Bank forecasts Brazil’s economy to grow a mediocre 1.4 percent this year amid weak demand from key export market China, while Mexico is expected to see 2.8 percent growth amid market-boosting reforms such as opening the energy sector to private investment. 

Brazil overtook Mexico as Latin America’s largest economy in 2005, but Mexico’s steadier growth has put the nation on pace to reclaim the top position. 

“In economic terms, Mexico is certainly better positioned than Brazil for the future, since Mexico has already approved some reforms which will strengthen the economic fundamentals and will put the economy on a higher step in terms of its production capacity,” says Alfredo Coutiño, Latin America director for Moody's Analytics. 

“Meanwhile, Brazil will still have to deal with a political transition after the World Cup, and only after the election results [will] the country have some strength to focus on structural changes.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.