After Chávez, politicians cannot ignore Venezuela's poor

Analysts agree that after Chávez, no politician can succeed in Venezuela without a platform that touches on social inclusion.

Jorge Silva/Reuters
Supporters of Venezuela's late President Hugo Chavez watch as his coffin arrives at the Military Academy, where his wake will be held, in Caracas March 6. Authorities have not yet said where Chavez will be buried after his state funeral on Friday.

Many Venezuelans awoke this morning still coming to terms with the loss of their president, Hugo Chávez, and wondering – along with the world – what the future holds for a post-Chávez Venezuela.

Vice President Nicolas Maduro announced Chávez’s passing after a two-year battle with cancer yesterday afternoon in a nationally televised broadcast. Immediately a large number of Venezuelans, including retiree Carmen Gonzalez, flocked to Caracas’s iconic Plaza Bolívar.

"I'm so upset; it's incredibly painful," Ms. Gonzalez says, holding back tears. "Venezuela suffered a huge loss … President Chávez can't be replaced."

Replacing him, however, is a must: The Constitution stipulates that elections be called within 30 days, with the president of the National Assembly taking over as interim leader. But in a sign that Chávez’s word is law, even after his death, his designated successor as presidential candidate for the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), Mr. Maduro, has stepped into the interim position instead, Foreign Minister Elias Jaua announced last night.

There are no shortage of variables playing into the transition – from respect for the Constitution to peace in the streets to the possibility of food shortages. It is expected that the individual who steps into the role of president will be faced with continuing much of Chávez’s popular social programming, while dealing with an unstable economy that depends on international imports and petrodollars.

But analysts agree that after Chávez, no politician can succeed without a platform that touches on social inclusion.   

"[Chávez has] given real hope to members of the lower classes," says Eric Farnsworth, vice president of the Council of the Americas. “That's not something an opposition candidate will want to – or even be able to – walk away from.”

Reaching the people

Condemned by his critics for causing rampant inflation, crime, and corruption, Chávez's special brand of populist-fueled socialism struck a resonant chord with Venezuelans fed up with the decades of exclusive “politics as usual” that preceded his time in office. His electoral base has been the poor and working class, who felt for decades they were brushed aside by the two parties that dominated the political spectrum.

Coining the term "socialism for the 21st century," the former Army paratrooper shored up unprecedented support during his tenure by investing the country's vast oil wealth in subsidies and popular assistance programs providing anything from free medical care to housing and groceries.

Almost 60 percent of Venezuelans favor his policies, according to Luis Vicente Leon, president of the polling firm, Datanalisis, though he also calls the number “incredibly volatile."

But “the situation today in Venezuela is very difficult," says Herbert Koeneke, a political science professor at Simon Bolivar University, referring to skyrocketing public debt accrued during the Chávez years and a faltering oil industry.

Despite having the world's largest proven oil reserves, South America's largest oil exporter is now importing oil products from the US to meet its domestic demand. Production has dwindled by an estimated 25 percent since Chávez took office. The US Energy Information Agency reported last year that 89,000 barrels were exported daily to Venezuela.

And that presents an added challenge to his successor – whether it’s Maduro from the PSUV, or the opposition’s expected candidate, Henrique Capriles.

“An election without Chávez could increase the opposition's prospects should shortages of food, medicines, and other basic goods continue intensifying in Venezuela,” IHS Global Insight Latin America analyst Diego Moya-Ocampos said via email.

The latest polling data from Hinterlaces, collected prior to the announcement of Chávez’s death, shows that if Maduro and Mr. Capriles face off in a presidential election, Maduro is projected to win 50 percent of respondents support; Capriles 36 percent; with 14 percent of respondents undecided. And though Maduro had Chávez’s backing, that doesn’t make him Chávez.

"The popularity of Chávez is not solely based on his policies but rather on Chávez himself," Mr. Leon says.

"He's a phenomenon," says Eduardo Brown, a retired public administrator, while paying his respects to the president at the Plaza Bolívar last night. "It's his charisma, the rational behind his actions. He's the only president that has truly reached the people."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.