Sudan is in revolt. Why isn't anyone listening?

Last week in the midst of a violent suppression of protest, Sudan's interior minister was in New York discussing peace and humanity. It was appalling. 

People chant slogans against the government's deadly crackdown on protesters against subsidy cuts late last month, during a demonstration after Friday prayers in north Khartoum, Sudan October 4, 2013.

A version of this post originally appeared in the Enough Said Project blog. The views expressed are the author's own. 

Despite mass protests against austerity measures in Sudan in recent weeks -- leaving about 210 protesters dead and over 2000 arrested and detained -- the international community, including the United States, has been far too silent.

Despite a few condemnations, the relations of most countries with Sudan have continued without interference. Graphic images of injured and dead protesters have spread widely through social media, visually portraying the story of an incipient Sudanese revolution and the government’s brutal crackdown in response. The hopes of opponents to the regime for international solidarity and support have so far been disappointed.

In fact many seem to believe the protests are over, despite the fact that hundreds have been going out on the street. 

Last week the Interior Minister of Sudan, Ibrahim Mohamed Hamed, was in New York to discuss humanitarian aid access for vaccinations for children under five years old. The mere fact that the Sudanese government holds these types of services hostage to politics is appalling.

While in New York, he also participated participated in an event in New York hosted by the International Peace Institute to discuss “how to strengthen the resilience of communities in Sudan and deliver a more efficient and sustainable humanitarian response.”

While this a worthy idea in principle, it sends the wrong message to a country where large numbers of Sudanese are mourning the deaths of 210 people at the hands of Sudanese police led by Mr. Hamed and millions more in Darfur, Abyei, South Kordofan and Blue Nile.

The visit also provided him with a platform to continue to spread falsehoods that have been disseminated by the government on the protests, the dire conditions in the Nuba Mountains, and the rising violence in Darfur.

Hamid gave a preview of the government’s line in a press conference in Khartoum when he was asked about the excessive force used against the protesters. According to him, “The police have it under control…. They have been around for 150 years and they work with organization and strategy that we trust.” According to him, the protesters are “saboteurs” who were trying to burn gas stations and government property, forcing the police to take action to control the situation.

Meanwhile,videos of police and military shooting at peacefully demonstrating protesters have circulated the internet acting as a testament for how the police really have handled the situation.

When asked about the graphic images of obviously Sudanese protesters slain by the police, Hamid cynically answered that they were fabricated images taken from the Egyptian revolution.

It is the responsibility of the international community and governments with influence to make clear that the actions of the Sudanese government are not acceptable.

One way not to do that is to invite senior officials with bloody hands to events at which they can showcase their positive spin, while brushing an inconvenient reality under the rug. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Sudan is in revolt. Why isn't anyone listening?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today