Farmers in Africa need policy changes, not just 'seeds, weather, and soil'

Government action is essential to agricultural growth that would combat poverty in Africa, experts say. Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa's annual report, released Wednesday, discusses previous successes and looks to the future. 

Reuters/File
Razack Munboadan (l.), senior manager with Karuturi, an Indian company with four commercial farms in Ethiopia, talks to his workers at Karuturi's farm in Bako, central Ethiopia on Nov. 6, 2009.

African nations will struggle to grow their economies and combat poverty unless they tie high-level political will to government action to help farmers, agricultural experts said in Rwanda on Wednesday.

Successfully using agriculture to push broader economic growth – as many nations in Asia have done – shows political support is "more important than seeds, weather, and soil," they added.

"There is no economy in the world that has grown without its foundation rooted in agriculture as the engine," said Boaz Keizire, head of policy and advocacy at the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), a nonprofit.

"Even the United States of America, China, and all the Asian Tigers ... started with having a robust agricultural transformation and agricultural-led industrialisation," Mr. Keizire told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

He was speaking after the launch of AGRA's 2018 Africa Agriculture Status Report, which lauded Rwanda and Ethiopia as models in pairing political will with government action to transform small-scale farms into "poverty-fighting powerhouses."

Opponents have criticized leaders of both countries for running what they describe as authoritarian states, raising questions about whether agricultural transformation might be more effective under strongman leaders.

Paul Kagame has been Rwanda's president for 18 years, while Ethiopia has only this year begun releasing long-held political prisoners as part of a national reconciliation effort.

Keizire, one of the report's authors, said agricultural success in African nations required political energy, targeted policy reforms, government capacity, and an enabling environment for agribusiness.

And he warned that failure to build public support for agriculture's potential would delay the continent's agricultural transformation by decades – or see it never realized.

Role model

Earlier this year, the African Union declared Rwanda to be the continent's best-performing nation in terms of agricultural transformation.

Rwanda's success is built in part on the increase in the number of registered cooperatives, which rose from about 2,500 in 2010 to more than 8,000 in 2018, according to the Rwanda Cooperative Agency, a public body.

In Rwamuzenga Mashland, which lies 87 miles south of the capital, about 4,000 smallholder farmers in a local cooperative have successfully grown maize on a more than 500-hectare stretch of wetland by planting sweet potatoes on the edges of raised soil beds to prevent erosion.

Boniface Nayigisiki, who heads the cooperative, said members had benefited from government efforts to help farmers work together in cooperatives "for easy access to credit, extension services and markets."

Combating poverty

AGRA's report, released at the Africa Green Revolution Forum in Kigali, said a quarter-century of growth in Ethiopia's farm sector had halved rural poverty rates there, while Rwanda's poverty had declined by a quarter in the same period.

It cited examples of agricultural transformation in other countries including China, whose rural poverty rate declined from 53 percent in 1981 to 8 percent by 2001.

And it noted that political momentum and government capabilities for backing agricultural transformation were improving in countries such as Kenya, Burkina Faso, Mali, and Zambia.

In Kenya, for example, President Uhuru Kenyatta's government is focused on four development pillars – manufacturing, food security, universal health care, and affordable housing.

It has allocated about 20 billion Kenyan shillings ($200 million) to boost food security and nutrition by 2022, said Henry Rotich, cabinet secretary for Kenya's treasury. A further $24 million will support manufacturing programs, including some that would add value to agricultural products.

Meanwhile, Ghana's President Nana Akufo-Addo's government is promoting agriculture transformation through a "Planting for Food and Jobs" campaign.

Mamadou Biteye, managing director of the Africa regional office for The Rockefeller Foundation – one of AGRA's funders – said change was also needed on the ground.

"Many times, the crops die next to a river stream because there is no rainfall. My message is that crops do not need rainfall, they need water," he said.

David Phiri, the sub-regional coordinator for Eastern Africa for the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization, said the continent could still produce enough food despite a rising population and a changing climate.

"We've seen some of the worst droughts in the past two years in East Africa, but the impact to people was minimal. That means governments are becoming resilient," he said.

And, he added, the continent would see life improve for many of its small-scale farmers if governments simply acted on more of the agreements that they signed.

"Signing an agreement is one thing. But implementing the same is another," he said.

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.