Kenyan election board delays repeat election date

President Uhuru Kenyatta says the ruling of election by the Supreme Court is a 'coup' against the will of the people. 

Khalil Senosi/AP
Kenya's President Uhuru Kenyatta speaks to the media at State House in Nairobi, Kenya on Sept. 21, 2017. Kenya's president said the nullification of his re-election is a blow to the democratic ideals Kenyans fought for, describing it as a 'judicial coup,' while the electoral commission announced that it has moved the date for a fresh presidential election to Oct. 26.

Kenya's President Uhuru Kenyatta said on Thursday the country's Supreme Court staged a "coup" against the will of the people when it annulled his win in last month's presidential election, his toughest rhetoric yet in the wake of the Aug. 8 vote.

His remarks came on the same day that the election board announced the repeat election had been delayed until Oct. 26.

The president's criticism comes as Kenya's political temperature is heating up, reviving fears of political violence. Clashes killed around 1,200 people following a disputed 2007 presidential vote.

"A coup in Kenya has just been done by the four people in the Supreme Court," Mr. Kenyatta said in a televised meeting with supporters, delivered mostly in Kiswahili. "[The court is saying] 'numbers don't matter, it is processes that matter.'"

Immediately following the court's surprise Sept. 1 ruling to annul the vote, Kenyatta had called for calm and respect for the ruling. But he later started to criticize the court.

The decision to nullify the race on procedural grounds was the first time a judicial body canceled the election of an incumbent African president.

Kenya, a Western ally, has East Africa's richest economy and is a hub for diplomacy, security, and trade in a region often battered by conflict. Any sign of political instability sends ripples through the region.

The election board had said last month that Kenyatta won the Aug. 8 vote by 1.4 million more votes than his chief rival, veteran opposition leader Raila Odinga, who contested the result in court.

Four judges and two dissenting judges gave a detailed case for voiding the election – or upholding it – in a marathon 12-hour court session on Wednesday.

Kenyatta said in a televised news conference that the court had failed to adequately examine evidence that would have buttressed his win.

"The Supreme Court owes Kenyans an explanation how such a monstrous injustice took place," he said. "It (the ruling) also now has the potential to throw our country into judicial chaos."

He said lower courts could follow the precedent and overturn the will of voters in other electoral contests, like local or legislative seats, adding he had asked parliament to address the issues raised by the judgment.

On Thursday, the cabinet approved $97 million to fund the repeat election.

Mr. Odinga has said he will not take part in the repeat vote unless a list of demands, including firing of some senior staff at the election board, are met. The court said it had found no evidence of individual culpability by the staff of the board.

The court ruled that the country must hold the election by the end of October.

The court's detailed judgment given on Wednesday hinged on the failure of the election board to check electronic tallies, which are vulnerable to typos, against paper forms intended as a fail-safe backup before announcing results. Judges did not say they found evidence of rigging.

Kenyatta said he would respect the court's decision but said it subverted the will of the people.

"We have reversed everything in this country by the decision of a few people. I don't know how history will judge these gentlemen," he said. "The citizen has been told he does not have a voice.... If that is not dictatorship, then I don't know what to say."

This story was reported by Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Kenyan election board delays repeat election date
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today