India dilemma: Arrest Sudan's Bashir and irk Africa, or ignore the ICC?

India is caught between interests in Africa – including a $1.4 billion deal with Sudan – and its desires for a seat on the UN Security Council. 

Saurabh Das/AP
Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir (l.) is welcomed by Indian Minister of State for External Affairs Vijay Kumar Singh as he arrives for the India Africa Forum Summit at the Indira Gandhi International airport in New Delhi Wednesday.

Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir has landed in India and already he is causing a stir. 

The controversial leader, indicted for genocide and war crimes by the International Criminal Court (ICC), is attending the India-Africa Summit in New Delhi this week where more than 40 African leaders will gather. 

But the ICC says that India is obliged to arrest and hand over President Bashir. India is not a signatory to the ICC but the court is citing a UN Security Council resolution to restrict Mr. Bashir's travel. So the case appears to pit India’s ambitious goals in Africa against its aspirations to be a larger global player. 

“Although Indians and Africans comprise nearly 2.5 billion people, our nations continue to be excluded from appropriate representation in the institutions of global governance,” said India’s external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj said on Tuesday.

For more than six years, Bashir has dodged the ICC's warrants for his arrest – most recently in South Africa – and remains an embarrassing example of the court's failure to compel African states to comply with its laws.

India says officially that it will be “fully compliant with its international legal obligations" when asked about the arrest of Bashir. But the ICC’s demand also puts India in a peculiar position since it both risks $1.4 billion in trade and investment with Sudan and broader displeasure from many African states who view the ICC negatively for its role on the continent. 

Since the ICC began pursuing cases in 2002, it has opened nine cases in eight countries – all of them in Africa – causing some African leaders to argue there is a bias, The Christian Science Monitor reports. 

“There are people who have the power to use international justice or international law to judge others and it does not apply to them,” said Rwandan President Paul Kagame in 2013. 

In 2013, the AU passed a resolution that no sitting African head of state should be tried before the ICC — a direct jab at the court’s warrants for the arrest of Kenya’s president Uhuru Kenyatta and his deputy William Ruto on charges of instigating violence in aftermath of the country’s 2007 election. The following year, the ICC officially withdrew its charges against Mr. Kenyatta. 

A large blow to the ICC came in June when, during a visit to South Africa by Bashir for an AU conference, South African authorities defied a local court that barred him from leaving. South Africa, unlike India, is an ICC signatory. The failure to arrest Bashir has created a domestic legal quandary, forcing the ICC to consider if South Africa is in violation of the Rome Statute and deserving of censure by the UN Security Council. 

It is doubtful that India, which seeks a Security Council seat, wants a similar problem.

India and Sudan, in fact, have had a long history. India was one of the first Asian countries to recognize Sudan and establish diplomatic relations with it. India is also the second largest exporter to Sudan after China, and some Indian oil, gas, and construction firms operate in Sudan.

The Sudanese leader is wanted on charges that include crimes against humanity in the country’s Darfur region. He has eluded the warrants since the first one was issued in 2009. ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda says that India has an obligation to hand the leader over. 

"By arresting and surrendering ICC suspects, India can contribute to the important goal of ending impunity for the world's worst crimes," she told reporters. 

India's interests in Africa are prominently displayed at the conference this week: A growing need for more energy and commodities has forced India to ramp up trade with Africa, which has grown 20 times since 2000, and doubled in the last five years to reach nearly $72 billion in 2014 making India a top-five Africa investor. 

Summits like the one this week are not uncommon among countries that have interests in Africa. The United States for example hosted African leaders for the first time in 2014. And China, the Asian giant in Africa, will host its Sixth China-Africa Cooperation Forum in a few months.

India sees this summit – its third and largest – as an opportunity to increase trade and economic links that will put it in direct competition with China’s billions.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.