Backlash to ICC trial? How Kenyan bill could clamp down on 'foreign influences'

Only a handful of Kenya's NGOs pushed for a trial of those thought to be behind the 2008 election violence. But their actions have boosted public support for putting limits on NGOs, something a proposed bill would do.

Thomas Mukoya/Reuters
Kenya's President Uhuru Kenyatta (l.) talked to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon as they arrived for a summit at the United Nations Environment Programme in Nairobi late last month. Many Kenyans have been upset that their president was called before the International Criminal Court in relation to post-election violence in Kenya in 2008.

As a case centered on post-election violence in Kenya comes to a head at the International Criminal Court, the role Kenyan NGOs played in pushing for politicians – including President Uhuru Kenyatta – to be tried there is casting a chill over their future work.

Only a handful of Kenya's 8,500 registered NGOs pushed for a trial of those thought to be behind the 2008 election violence. But the actions of a few, combined with the sweeping tirades by Kenyatta supporters against this "evil society," is increasing public support for putting limits on NGOs. Now, a bill has been introduced that would require all Kenyan NGOs receiving more than 15 percent of their budget from non-Kenyan interests to register as foreign agents.

It's a worrying development for many here – and in the region. Kenya is often viewed as East Africa's most robust democracy, but with little public outcry against the government's efforts to put a squeeze on civil society, some fear that stature may be slipping.

The message of the proposed law is clear, says Regina Opondo, co-chair of the Civil Society Organization Reference Group, an umbrella consortium: “All efforts are going to be used to limit this democratic space we’ve worked so hard to secure.”

'Drawn the lines'

The amendments to the law governing NGOs in Kenya were first broached in 2013. But they were revived as Mr. Kenyatta appeared before the ICC in October, putting more pressure on NGOs. 

“Yes, [civil society groups] were involved in the ICC cases and pushing for proper investigation into them, but the current [effort to limit them] isn’t really about these cases,” says Patrick Gathara, a prominent political commentator.

“It’s more about stopping or restricting civil society,” Mr. Gathara says. “The cases ... have made more stark the differences, drawn the lines. People have a side to take,” between supporting the ICC trials or rallying against them, and blaming Kenyan NGOs..

In addition, growing insecurity has fueled suspicion that some NGOs in the country, particularly those grounded in the Muslim community, are providing support to militant groups under the guise of social services. Accusations of harboring and assisting terrorists resonate amid frequent attacks by Al Shabab from neighboring Somalia.

A 'foreign agenda'?

NGO “accountability” has been a tenet of the Kenyatta government since its inception, appearing in the Jubilee coalition’s manifesto in 2013 and again in the president’s Mashujaa (Heroes) Day speech on Oct. 20.

“To this day, there are those abroad that seek to advance their economic and geopolitical goals to our disadvantage. They fund and nurture various outfits whose actions and visions seem set to create cleavages between Kenyans," Kenyatta said in his speech.

“Our democratic space with its right to free speech and association gives them the opportunity to use exaggerated, dishonest claims of victimhood to radicalize and recruit Kenyan youth. Their funding and activities must be uncovered at all times to put a stop to their campaign to kill innocent Kenyan civilians and the brave members of our security forces.”

Moses Kuria, the MP who sponsored the bill, the timing of which is uncertain, says it's merely an effort to ensure NGOs are properly spending donors’ money after years of misuse of funds.

“People who receive money to do things they’re not supposed to do, they’re the ones affected,” Mr. Kuria says.

He says most of the NGOs in Kenya will have to register as foreign agents if the bill succeeds.

The registration – if the bill passes – should not have a practical impact on NGO operations, but the classification is damaging in the eyes of Kenyans who resent the sight of their president sitting in an international court.  

“These organizations aren’t foreign organizations. They are organizations led by Kenyans, staffed by Kenyans. Yes, they do get foreign funding, but that is not the equivalent of following a foreign agenda,” Mr. Gathara says.

Not just a challenge for Kenya

The freedom afforded to civil society in Kenya has waxed and waned. The 1980s and 1990s were bad years under the repressive government of President Daniel arap Moi, but in the early 2000s, with the election of President Mwai Kibaki, restrictions began to lift.

Today, Kenya stands out among its neighbors for its tolerance of organizations that pressure the government or citizens who criticize it.

When civil society representatives visit from countries like Tanzania and Uganda, they call what we do here “crazy,” says Ms. Opondo, referring to public criticism of the government, and the space for dissent. 

“You don’t think ‘I’m doing this for the whole region’,” she says, but neighboring nations see Kenya as the hope for East Africa. “These charges are worrying for them, too.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Backlash to ICC trial? How Kenyan bill could clamp down on 'foreign influences'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/2014/1107/Backlash-to-ICC-trial-How-Kenyan-bill-could-clamp-down-on-foreign-influences
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe