Showing at Little League World Series buoys Uganda enthusiasm for baseball

A Ugandan team participated for the first time in the Little League World Series last weekend. While it's a boost, critics say much needs to be done to put youth baseball on a solid footing in Uganda.

Gene J. Puskar/AP
The Little League baseball team from Lugazi, Uganda participates in the opening ceremony of the 2012 Little League World Series tournament in South Williamsport, Pa., last week.

Uganda’s first-ever showing at the Little League World Series in Williamsport, Penn., last weekend would seem to signal a bright future for baseball in the landlocked east African country.

The team was eliminated after two games, but the talent was evident. When the boys return home this month, they will be greeted like celebrities, and more will want to play. Dozens of sources, from individuals to sports companies, touched by stories of the kids playing barefoot on dusty lots back home, have offered to send money and equipment. Others have offered to coach.

But expectations for the sport – which some 700 boys and girls play here  – won’t be met unless Uganda addresses how the sport is currently being run, according to some observers. 

Behind this fairy tale story is a bout of internal politics and allegations of mismanagement and neglect. "It's gotten very political," says Peter Etabu, Uganda's country manager for Right to Play, a Canada-based NGO responsible for handling more than $100,000 in donor gifts. "We don't want to be a part of it."

A new ball field that was to be completed by now in a Kampala slum has been postponed indefinitely. Equipment supplies, sent by the heaploads after Uganda almost made the Little League World Series last year, have dwindled, with one league team’s storage facility reduced to one bat, two gloves, and a ball. One official has accused another of misappropriating a portion of more than $100,000 sent by an international donor.

Richard Stanley, a chemical engineer from Staten Island, N.Y., and founder of Uganda Little League, has been crucial in developing the sport. Twenty miles west of Kampala, he has built a baseball complex containing all three of Uganda’s only baseball fields and more than 100 dormitory beds.

But he and George Mukhobe, who heads the recently formed Uganda Baseball and Softball Association (UBASA), have barely spoken to each other in months. UBASA is the only local baseball organization recognized by Uganda’s National Council of Sports. Camps have built up around the two former allies, with each being told he doesn’t need the other to develop the sport.

Timothy Magala Semakula, of the National Council of Sports, points to other key shortcomings, like a lack of strategic planning, responsible budgeting, and greater commitment among locals. UBASA, he says, has undertaken few, if any, income-generating projects. Stanley reportedly doesn’t own the property his ball fields are on, and there’s some uncertainty as to what will happen to the complex once he is no longer involved with it.

But there has been some progress. Mr. Mukhobe helped arrange Major League Baseball’s first-ever scouting camp in Kampala last month, which dozens of players attended. And Mr. Stanley has been working with the Uganda sports commissioner to see to it that seven or more secondary schools will be playing baseball in the upcoming school year. He has also persuaded American baseball manufacturers to throw down 900 gloves and more than 1,000 baseballs for the cause.

The exposure from the Little League World Series is an extra boost to the fledgling sport. But Mr. Semakula also knows the biggest impediment to success is structural, and that foreigners and their dollars will provide no quick fix.

“If it goes on like this, we’ll leave no trail of tangible results behind,” he predicts.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.