On trip to China, South Sudan's leader warns of war with Sudan

South Sudanese President Kiir is in Beijing to tighten economic links to China, traditionally a close ally of Sudan's.

Alexander F. Yuan/AP
South Sudan's President Salva Kiir (r.) reviews honor guard with Chinese President Hu Jintao during a welcoming ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, Tuesday, April 24.

Sudan had “declared war” on South Sudan, that country’s president said Tuesday, after days of aerial bombing that killed two people, wounded dozens, and destroyed both civilian markets and state oil infrastructure.

President Salva Kiir’s remarks, made during a visit to China to meet its president, Hu Jintao, marked a further worsening of a weeks-long crisis that threatens to take Sudan and South Sudan back to all-out conflict. 

Mr. Kiir told Mr. Hu that his visit came at “a very critical moment for the Republic of South Sudan because our neighbor in Khartoum has declared war on the Republic of South Sudan.” 

He was referring to Omar al-Bashir, Sudan’s president, who last week vowed to revenge earlier South Sudanese incursions into his territory by “eliminating” the “insects” ruling South Sudan and “liberating” its people. 

Eight bombs hit villages south of the countries’ disputed border late Monday night, South Sudanese officials said. The extent of the casualties was not immediately clear, and Sudan denied its air force dropped the weapons. 

Several people were badly wounded, and one young boy was killed, when aircraft dropped three bombs earlier Monday around Bentiu town, a South Sudanese town 40 miles from the border area. 

Kiir is in Beijing to tighten economic links to China, traditionally a close ally of Mr. Bashir's, whose spokesman denied Tuesday that any official declaration of war had been made. 

“China sincerely hopes that South Sudan and Sudan can become good neighbors who co-exist in amity and good partners who develop together,” Hu told Kiir during their meeting, according to Chinese state television. "The urgent task is to actively cooperate with the mediation efforts of the international community and halt armed conflict in the border areas.”

Aid groups are increasingly worried that fighting will worsen an already dire situation for civilians living in the border areas. 

"We are incredibly concerned about the wellbeing of children fleeing in terror from aerial bombardment, separated from their families, seeing their homes destroyed and at risk of violence and deprivation as the conflict continues," said Jon Cunliffe, head of Save The Children in South Sudan.

South Sudan became an independent nation in 2011 as part of the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement that ended Africa’s longest-running civil war between Sudan’s Arab Muslim north and its majority Christian south. 

But that deal failed to finalize key points of dispute between the two countries, including where the border lay and how to share oil revenues. 

Both sides must “put an immediate end to armed hostilities,” Ramtane Lamamra, security commissioner for the African Union, told a session of the body’s peace and security committee that met Tuesday to discuss the crisis. 

"These two brothers and neighbors [must] implement all accords that have been put forward by the African Union panel,” he said. Attempts by the AU to ink deals on the most contentious issues have so far failed. 

There is still hope, however, that a full return to conflict may be short lived, as both countries have suffered severe losses of income since South Sudan cut off the flow of crude from its oilfields in January. 

“Neither side has any money, but both appear blind to the awful effect that war will have on their finances, and their civilian populations,” one Western diplomat in Khartoum, Sudan’s capital, told the Monitor. 

“It’s likely that once they realize that they simply cannot afford war, they will be forced to the negotiating table. Both are just trying to get into the strongest position they can before that inevitable situation comes.” 

Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.