Resistance against autocrats grows worldwide, says Human Rights Watch

The agency's annual report said that states, civic groups, and popular movements are pushing back against autocrats who are seeking to curtail freedoms. Populists are fueling a resistance that keeps winning, which re-energizes the global defense of human rights, the report says.

Marko Djurica/Reuters
A drawing depicting Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban is projected during a protest against a proposed new labor law, billed as the 'slave law,' in Budapest, Hungary, on Dec. 17, 2018. Human Rights Watch's annual report points to a growing global trend to confront autocrats.

The world is seeing growing resistance against the abuses of autocrats as states, civic groups, and popular movements all push back against populists who are seeking to curtail freedoms, Human Rights Watch said Thursday.

In its annual assessment of rights around the world, the advocacy group said rising opposition to authoritarian governments has been the most important development in the past year.

"The same populists who spread hatred and intolerance are fueling a resistance that keeps winning battles," agency director Kenneth Roth said. "Important battles are being won, re-energizing the global defense of human rights."

The report, released in Berlin, said the pushback can be seen in efforts to resist attacks on democracy in Europe, to prevent a bloodbath in Syria, or to stop the Saudi-led bombing and blockade of Yemeni civilians.

In Europe, support for rights took many forms, on the streets and in institutions, the report said.

Large crowds protested Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's increasingly authoritarian rule and his limits on academic freedom. Tens of thousands took to the streets in Poland to protest the government's attempts to erode the independence of the judiciary. On the government level, Germany, Denmark, and Finland stopped arms sales to Saudi Arabia following the killing of Saudi writer Jamal Khashoggi.

In the United States, the opposition Democrats gained control of the House of Representatives in the midterm election, with voters rejecting what it called "fear-mongering" by President Trump, "who sought to mobilize his support base by trying to portray asylum-seekers fleeing Central American violence as a crisis."

Voters in Malaysia and the Maldives ousted their corrupt prime ministers, Armenia's prime minister stepped down amid massive protests over corruption, and Ethiopia, under popular pressure, replaced a long-abusive government with a prime minister who embarked on an impressive reform agenda.

"If you're an autocrat, it's very convenient to violate human rights – it's the way you stay in power, it's the way you fill up your bank account, it's the way you pay off your cronies," Mr. Roth told The Associated Press.

But, he added, "the role of the human rights movement is to raise the cost of these human rights violations – that's not something that's done overnight ... but we know that if you do raise the cost of abuse, ultimately, governments realize it is not paying and they start to curb these abuses."

Still, there have been setbacks on the human rights front.

China increased its repression over the past year to the worst level in decades. Roth expressed concern that President Xi Jinping ended term limits on his presidency and Chinese officials vastly expanded the country's surveillance of ordinary people.

"This year it became clear that he is detaining 1 million Uighur Muslims for so-called re-education, which basically means forcing them to renounce Islam and to renounce their ethnicity," Roth said.

Roth said if any other country was doing this "it would be an outrage, but China, because of its economic clout, has been getting away with it."

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Resistance against autocrats grows worldwide, says Human Rights Watch
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2019/0117/Resistance-against-autocrats-grows-worldwide-says-Human-Rights-Watch
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe