UN Security Council split on Rohingya crisis

The United States and others call for a strong stance against Myanmar's military for their part in the Rohingya crisis. But China and Russia urge the United Nations Security Council to work with Myanmar authorities instead of against them.

Denis Balibouse
Filippo Grandi, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, at a news conference on the Rohingya crisis in Myanmar at the United Nations in Geneva on Sept. 27, 2017. The UN Security Council held an open meeting regarding the crisis in which the US urged a stronger stance against Myanmar authorities.

The United Nations Security Council's first open meeting on Myanmar (formerly Burma) in eight years highlighted the body's deep divisions: China and Russia supported the Southeast Asian country's government while the United States, Britain, and France demanded an end to "ethnic cleansing" of its Rohingya Muslim minority.

With the number of Rohingyas fleeing to Bangladesh since Aug. 25 now topping 500,000, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres urged the UN's most powerful body on Thursday to take strong action. He also called on Myanmar's authorities to immediately halt military operations, allow "unfettered access" for humanitarian aid, and ensure that all those who fled can return home.

US Ambassador Nikki Haley, using Myanmar's former name of Burma, told council members: "We cannot be afraid to call the actions of the Burmese authorities what they appear to be: a brutal, sustained campaign to cleanse the country of an ethnic minority."

"The time for well-meaning, diplomatic words in this council has passed," she said. "We must now consider action against Burmese security forces who are implicated in abuses and stoking hatred among their fellow citizens."

Ms. Haley urged all countries to suspend the supply of weapons to the country's military until its members are held accountable for the "brutal assault" on the Rohingyas.

The US, Britain, and France were joined by many council members in demanding an immediate end to the violence and a strong council response.

A global coalition of 88 civil society and human rights organizations urged the Security Council to step up pressure on Myanmar's authorities "by seriously considering options such as an arms embargo against the military and targeted financial sanctions against individuals responsible or crimes and serious abuses."

But the prospect of a strong response from the council appeared unlikely after both China and Russia supported the government's approach to tackling the crisis.

China's deputy UN ambassador Wu Haitao, whose country has close ties to Myanmar, urged the international community "to view the difficulties and challenges confronting the government of Myanmar through objective optics, exercise patience, and provide support and help."

Mr. Wu stressed that "many of the differences and antagonisms" in Rakhine state have been building up over a long time and "there is no quick fix."

"As we speak, the situation on the ground is beginning to move toward stability," Wu said. "All parties should work constructively to help reinforce this momentum, de-escalate the situation and alleviate the humanitarian conditions step-by-step."

Russia's UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia warned that "excessive pressure" on Myanmar's government "could only aggravate the situation in the country and around it."

There is no alternative to resolving "the longstanding and complicated crisis" in Rakhine through political means and a dialogue among representatives of all nationalities and faiths," he said. "We need to stop any kind of violence from any side and the rhetoric which fuels it."

The Russian ambassador and the UN secretary-general both warned that the Rohingya crisis could spread.

Mr. Guterres said "the failure to address this systematic violence could result in a spillover into central Rakhine, where an additional 250,000 Muslims could potentially face displacement."

He also warned that the humanitarian crisis is a breeding ground for radicalization, criminals, and traffickers. And he said the broader crisis "has generated multiple implications for neighboring states and the larger region, including the risk of inter-communal strife."

Mr. Nebenzia said "terrorists and extremists ... are already trying to put down roots in Southeast Asia" and "we cannot allow further radicalization in the region."

The council meeting also exposed tensions between Myanmar and Bangladesh.

Myanmar's national security adviser blamed the crisis in Rakhine state on terrorism and declared that "there is no ethnic cleansing and no genocide in Myanmar."

U Thaung Tun said security operations ended Sept. 5 and the vast majority of those who fled to Bangladesh did so because "fear was instilled in the heart by the terrorists."

More than 50 percent of villages in Rakhine state are intact and people are living in peace with their neighbors, he said.

He announced that diplomats, accompanied by the media, will be visiting northern Rakhine on Monday. And he said Guterres has been invited to visit Myanmar.

"It is imperative that the international community join hands with us to ensure that democracy takes firm root," Mr. U Thaung Tun said. "The Security Council must refrain from taking measures that exacerbate rather than alleviate the situation in Rakhine state. It can and must do no less."

But Bangladesh's UN Ambassador Masud Bin Momen told the council the violence in Rakhine hasn't stopped despite government claims.

He said Rohingyas described rape being used as a weapon to scare families to leave, and reported villages being burned, and people being looted and abused.

"These atrocities attest that the Myanmar government is using arson to de-populate northern Rakhine and take over ownership of lands," he said.

Bin Momen said the Security Council should also take into account that reportedly more than two divisions of Myanmar's armed forces were deployed near the Bangladesh border in the first week of August with heavy armaments and artillery.

With the arrival of over 500,000 Rohingyas since Aug. 25, he said Bangladesh is now hosting over 900,000 members of "this most persecuted minority in the world."

Bin Momen called this situation untenable and reiterated an appeal to the UN to create "safe zones" inside Myanmar.

The Security Council over the years has discussed Myanmar behind closed doors, including three recent closed meetings. The last open meeting in 2009 was attended by then-Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

This story is reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to UN Security Council split on Rohingya crisis
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today