Colombia’s second peace deal passes. What starts on 'D-Day'?

After voters stunned the world by rejecting the first peace deal, a new version has breezed through congress.

Ivan Valencia/AP
Women hug during a rally in support of the peace process with rebels of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) on Nov. 24, 2016, a few blocks from the venue where Colombia's President Juan Manuel Santos and top FARC rebel leader Rodrigo Londono signed a revised peace pact, in Bogota, Colombia.

Colombia’s congress ratified a peace accord with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) guerrillas on Wednesday, two months after a majority of voters downed the first accord in a referendum.

The new version contains 50 changes to the original deal, including a provision by which the rebels agree to forfeit assets to victims’ families, and another that prohibits foreign judges from ruling on crimes allegedly committed by either rebels or the government, according to the Associated Press.

The vote brings to a close four years of negotiations and inaugurates a 150-day transition period that will see the FARC move its fighters into protected areas and turn over their weapons to United Nations monitors. It’s a tense period that could pose the greatest challenge yet in Colombia’s still-uncertain path to peace, putting to the test the slow legitimization of a widely reviled guerrilla force – and by extension, the broadening of the country’s political spectrum.

A new era begins tomorrow,” said president Juan Manuel Santos after the vote, according to Colombia’s El Pais. “D-Day begins tomorrow. That means in five days, the movement of all FARC members to transition zones will begin.”

By Dec. 30, he added, all members of the FARC must be in those zones. Under the terms of the accord, the rebels will hand over 30 percent of their arms to the UN by Jan. 30 and 60 percent by the end of February, completing the disarmament by the end of March, according to Colombia Reports. The weapons will be held in UN containers and eventually be used to create monuments to peace.

There are already signs that the peace could be imperiled, with five leftist activists killed and several others attacked in the days around the new accord’s signing, in an echo of the right-wing militia violence that derailed Colombia’s last attempt at peace, as The Christian Science Monitor’s Joe Parkin Daniel reported on Nov. 28:

In the past 10 days, five activists have been killed and a number of others attacked in separate incidents. No group has yet claimed responsibility, but authorities suspect the attacks are being carried out by criminal groups that formed in the wake of the demobilization of right-wing militias nearly a decade ago.

On Friday morning, a social leader was killed in Neiva, a city southwest of Bogotá, following another killed on Wednesday in the port city Buenaventura. The weekend before, three other activists were gunned down: Erney Monroy and Didier Rosada Barreto, members of a peasant environmental organization, in San Vicente del Caguán; and Rodrigo Cabrera, a victims group leader, in Nariño, near the Ecuadorian border. 

A handful of other leaders were attacked but survived.

The accord passed unanimously in both chambers on Wednesday after opponents led by former president Álvaro Uribe walked out, in protest of a provision that allows former FARC leaders to avoid prison for war crimes. Mr. Uribe, the face of a successful campaign against the original accord, had managed to get several of his demands into the reformulated version, but the amnesty for rebel leaders remained a sticking point: In a speech before the senate, he denounced it as offering “total impunity” to the rebels.

The congressional vote also represents the government’s rejection of the referendum as a political tool, after low voter turnout and Mr. Uribe’s energized opposition contributed to the stunning loss in September.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.