Mosul offensive sees early success for anti-ISIS forces. What's next?

The Pentagon says that Iraqi forces have 'met their objectives' and are 'ahead of schedule' on the second day of the Mosul offensive.

Khalid Mohammed/AP
Iraqi forces are deployed during an offensive to retake Mosul from Islamic State militants outside Mosul, Iraq, Monday.

The initial stages of an offensive strike against Islamic State forces in Mosul saw success Monday, as forces reclaimed villages and made their way closer to the occupied city.

The strike intends to recapture the city that has become the Islamic State’s main stronghold in northern Iraq, but also will serve as a test of President Obama’s effort to defeat extremists without putting American forces on the ground. Instead, US forces are supporting a collaborative effort by the Kurdish Peshmerga, Sunni tribal fighters, and the Iraqi military to retake the city.

By the beginning of the second day of the battle, Kurdish fighters had seized nine villages to recapture 200 km of land in just 24 hours.

"Early indications are that Iraqi forces have met their objectives so far, and that they are ahead of schedule for this first day,” Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook told reporters during a breifing in Washington. "This is going according to the Iraqi plan – but again, it's early, and the enemy gets a vote here. We will see whether [IS] stands and fights."

While the United States has not deployed any forces on the ground, US air support, artillery, intelligence, advisers, and forward air controllers are assisting the 30,000 Iraqi personnel involved in the fight, and they remain “in harm’s way,” Mr. Cook said.

Still, the plan puts American forces at a lower risk than a US-led offensive would.

“It’s much more sustainable in terms of blood and treasure than obviously having our forces have to do it,” David Petraeus, the former Army general who commanded US and coalition forces in Iraq in 2007-08 and also served as Mr. Obama’s CIA director, said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”

Officials estimate that between 4,000 and 8,000 Islamic State fighters remain in Mosul after capturing the city of 1.5 million people two years ago.

If Iraqi and Kurdish forces successfully retake Mosul, tension is likely to remain between the nation’s Sunni, Shiite, and Kuridish populations. Now allied against a common enemy, these groups could clash again in violent ways following a successful military campaign.

“I think there’s a strong possibility that a lot of the political grievances actually get accentuated,” Seth Jones, a defense and security expert at the RAND Corp, told the Associated Press Friday.

By letting local forces have control of the push, the Obama administration hopes to defeat ISIS ideologically, rather than just with military force. A US-led effort likely would have depleted IS forces in Mosul sooner, but officials feared it would also fail to eradicate the extremist ideology in the ways that local leadership may be able to do.

“If we were to take control of this campaign, I mean literally seize control of the campaign, then there’s no doubt in my mind we would probably defeat ISIL on, let’s say, a faster timeline,” Gen. Martin Dempsey, a top military advisor to Obama at the time of the decision, told the Associated Press. “Maybe ISIL goes away, maybe they’re defeated militarily, and two years from now another group with another name and another ideology ... will just be back.”

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Mosul offensive sees early success for anti-ISIS forces. What's next?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today