Another GOP ticket rift as Putin claims 'no intention' of swaying US elections

The disagreement came after the Republican running mates publicly contradicted each other concerning US policy on Russia's military activity in Syria.

Alexei Druzhinin/Kremlin/Sputnik/Reuters
Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks Thursday during a news conference following the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) Summit in the western state of Goa, India.

Differing from his party's standard-bearer once again, Republican vice presidential candidate Mike Pence said Sunday that mounting evidence suggests hackers backed by Russia are responsible for recent email leaks pertaining to the US presidential election.

His comments affirmed the Obama administration's claim that Russia has been trying to meddle in the American political process – even as GOP nominee Donald Trump continued to cast doubts on the allegation and Russian President Vladimir Putin denied it.

"I think there's no question that the evidence continues to point in that direction," Mr. Pence said during a "Fox News Sunday" interview. "There should be severe consequences to Russia or any sovereign nation that is compromising the privacy or the security of the United States of America."

The disagreement, which came after the running mates publicly contradicted each other concerning US policy on Russia's military activity in Syria, could be seen as among the many hairline fractures rippling across the Republican party.

Even if the leaks do not sink Hillary Clinton's bid for the White House, Mr. Putin could be motivated by revenge, a desire for an "asymmetric information advantage," or a weaker American presidency, as The Christian Science Monitor's Peter Grier reported last week.

"In Moscow’s mind turmoil in Washington may be to Russia’s advantage," he wrote.

Intelligence officials have said Russia is behind recent hacks of Democratic Party emails, including ongoing releases via WikiLeaks of documents from the email account of John Podesta, campaign chairman of Mrs. Clinton, the Democratic nominee. Last week, during the second of three presidential debates, Clinton said the Russians were seeking to help her opponent.

"We have never in the history of our country been in a situation where an adversary, a foreign power, is working so hard to influence the outcome of the election. And believe me, they’re not doing it to get me elected. They’re doing it to try to influence the election for Donald Trump," Clinton said, according to a transcript published by The New York Times. 

Mr. Trump took a less conclusive view, arguing that Clinton doesn't know who hacked the Democratic party's emails.

"Maybe there is no hacking," he said. "But they always blame Russia. And the reason they blame Russia [is] because they think they're trying to tarnish me with Russia."

Trump's comments were similar during the first presidential debate, when he argued that nobody knows if Russia was responsible for the hack, including Clinton.

"She's saying Russia, Russia, Russia, but I don't – maybe it was," Trump said, according to a transcript published by The Washington Post. "I mean, it could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, OK?"

Trump continued to assert Sunday that members of the media are the ones meddling in this year's election, tweeting the claim four separate times – rhetoric fellow Republicans have denounced.

Putin himself again denied the meddling allegation Sunday, speaking in India after the summits of Brazil, Russia, China, and South Africa, the so-called BRICS nations.

"I want to calm down everybody, including our American friends and partners," Putin said, as NBC reported. "We have no intention of influencing the election campaign in the US."

Steven Pifer, a senior fellow in foreign policy at The Brookings Institution commented in tweets Sunday that Putin "tends to deny a lot of things that turn out to be true" and that defending Trump may be hurting Pence's shot at the White House during the next presidential election.

Russia is an issue in the election because of a "well-oiled system of distracting the voters from domestic problems," Putin said, adding that he hopes to restore ties following the Nov. 8 election.

"If our partners in the United States intend to work with us, we will," Putin said, as Bloomberg reported. "I hope that when the debate is over, this difficult period in the United State’s internal political life is over, there’ll be a chance to restore relations between Russia and the US."

Relations between the two countries have grown strained since a Syrian cease-fire collapsed last month, as the Monitor reported.

In a piece published Friday by The New Yorker, Joshua Yaffa suggests that Russia does not need a Trump presidency to successfully interfere in American politics.

“At this point, any Russian efforts to meddle in the election are likely not about trying to throw the election to Donald Trump, whose candidacy most serious Russian officials now believe is doomed," Mr. Yaffa wrote. "The goal, instead, is to confuse and discredit the American election process, in an attempt to weaken the country’s institutions and the likely future Clinton Presidency.”

Material from Reuters was included in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Another GOP ticket rift as Putin claims 'no intention' of swaying US elections
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today