Croatia election: exit polls show no clear winner

With no party holding a majority in parliament, it may take some time for a new government to form.

Darko Bandic/AP
A voter fills out a ballot in Zagreb, Croatia on Sunday.

An initial exit poll in Croatia's early parliamentary election Sunday indicated there will be no clear winner, paving the way for more political uncertainty in the European Union's newest member state.

The left-wing Peoples' Coalition won 57 seats in Croatia's 151-seat parliament, according to the poll conducted by Croatia's independent Ipsos Puls agency, carried by state TV. The conservative Croatian Democratic Union, or HDZ, had 57 seats, while kingmakers Most, or Bridge, won 12 seats.

The second vote in less than a year was called when a previous, right-wing government collapsed in June after less than six months in power, paralyzed by bickering within the ruling coalition.

Political deadlock has delayed reforms that are necessary for Croatia to catch up with the rest of the EU. It has also fueled nationalist rhetoric amid heightened tensions with Serbia — its wartime foe in the 1990s, raising fears of renewed tensions in the Balkans.

Some analysts have predicted that Croatia's next government could take months to form, and end up as weak as the previous one.

Croatia had tilted to the right under the HDZ-led government that took over following the inconclusive vote last November. However, in the past few weeks it has sought to remake its image as a centrist party under new leader Andrej Plenkovic.

The more moderate leader, who took over from right-leaning Tomislav Karamarko earlier this summer, said Sunday that he expects high turnout among Croatia's nearly 3.8 million voters.

"We are happy," Plenkovic said upon casting his ballot. "It's a beautiful day, so I expect the turnout to be bigger than if it was rainy."

Hours before the polls closed, the turnout was nearly 10 percent less than in November.

President Kolinda Grabar Kitarovic urged more Croats to come out and vote, saying the country's future is in their hands.

"The following months and years are truly decisive for Croatia, and today we have to be serious," Grabar Kitarovic said. "We can't complain later if the outcome of the election is not the way we want it to be."

HDZ and the Social Democrats, which is the largest party in the Peoples' Coalition, have been the two dominant parties in Croatia since the country split from former Yugoslavia in 1991. The Social Democrats, led by former Prime Minister Zoran Milanovic, were in power for four years until last November.

"We have shown that we are competent and that we have more heart," Milanovic said as he cast his vote Sunday. "The rest is up to the people."

Although more advanced than other Balkan countries, Croatia has one of the weakest economies in the EU following years of crisis after the 1991-95 war.

After a six-year recession, Croatia has shown signs of recovery with reported growth of more than 2 percent. However, unemployment hovers around 14 percent — among the highest in the EU — and much of the fiscal growth is attributed to tourism along Croatia's Adriatic coast.

Kristijan Naher, a voter from Zagreb, said that he hopes Croatians "will be smarter now" and vote conclusively to "avoid the agony" that followed the last election.

Zagreb resident Jelena Micic said she was hopeful things would improve.

"I think we are moving toward a better future for Croatia," Micic said.

___

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.