Tim Ireland/AP/File
Anjem Choudary, a British Muslim social and political activist and spokesman for Islamist group, Islam4UK, speaks following prayers at the Central London Mosque in Regent's Park, London, April 3, 2015. On Tuesday, Choudary, one of Britain's best-known radical preachers was sentenced to 5 ½ years in prison for encouraging support for the Islamic State group.

Britain sentences radical Islamic preacher Anjem Choudary to five years

Mr. Choudary, who has been sentenced to five years in prison for inciting violence, has vowed to radicalize all the prisoners with whom he comes into contact.

Anjem Choudary, Britain’s best-known radical Islamist preacher who urged young Muslims to wage jihad, was sentenced Tuesday to more than five years in prison for encouraging support of the self-declared Islamic State (IS) group.

Now, it’s up to the country’s Prison Services to decide if Mr. Choudary will serve alongside prisoners or in solitary confinement. He has warned jailing him will enable him to form a new congregation behind bars.

I’ll radicalize everyone in prison,” he said, according to the Daily Mail. “If they arrest me and put me in prison, I will carry on in prison.”

In light of this threat, Choudary’s defense at his sentencing hearing urged the judge to consider the impact solitary confinement would have on Choudary’s mental well-being when considering prison time. With reports of Islamic extremists becoming radicalized in prisons in the Middle East, Europe, and Guantanamo Bay, the defense’s argument calls into question whether prison is the most appropriate setting to punish Choudary or others like him.

Judge Timothy Holroyde said that concern is a matter for the Prison Service, and that Choudary should take responsibility if he finds himself in solitary confinement.

I do not think it would be right to reduce your sentence because of the possibility that your own behavior may cause the prison service to deal with you in a particular way,” said Justice Holroyde, according to BBC.

Holroyde added he couldn’t decide sentences on “speculation” over whether Choudary would be held in solitary confinement to prevent him from radicalizing others.

Choudary was sentenced to five years and six months in prison, after a jury convicted him of “inviting” support of IS. A lawyer by training, Choudary developed a reputation for an adept knowledge of how far he could push Britain’s free speech laws. But he and his confidant, Mohammed Mizanur Rahman, were arrested in 2014 for using the internet to urge followers to back IS. Mr. Rahman received the same sentence as Choudary.

"Their recent speeches and the oath of allegiance were a turning point for the police – at last we had the evidence that they had stepped over the line and we could prove they were actively encouraging support of ISIS," said Dean Haydon, head of counterterrorism at London's Metropolitan Police, according to Reuters.

According to trial testimony, Choudary and Mr. Rahman pledged allegiance to the “caliphate” through social media, and said Muslims had a duty to obey or provide support to the group’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

Both men had denied the terrorism charges and said the case against them was politically motivated.

Choudary also gained notoriety for touting Sharia law over democratic laws.

“Choudary has long been a source of frustration and anger for British officials for encouraging extremist ideas,” wrote Denise Hassanzade Ajiri for The Christian Science Monitor. “According to the anti-extremism group Hope Not Hate, at least 70 people with ties to Choudary or his organizations have been implicated in terrorism cases, but British authorities have not been able to gather solid evidence against him,” she wrote just after he was arrested in 2014.

Abdul Hakeem, an associate of Choudary, told Britain’s ITV network in a video that imprisoning Choudary will not prevent his message from being distributed. In fact, it may strengthen the preacher in the eyes of his followers, writes ITV. That reputation might also carry into prison.

Middle Eastern authorities have long tried to fight Islamic radicalization in prisons. In Jordan, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the founder of the predecessor of IS, as well as his followers were radicalized in prison, as The Washington Post’s Joby Warrick wrote in the book, “Black Flags: The Rise of ISIS.”

“There is increasing evidence that prisons in the West are now starting to play a similar role – particularly in the United Kingdom, which has seen more 'homegrown' terrorist plots (and consequently more terrorist convictions) than any other Western country,” James Brandon, a senior research fellow at the Quilliam Foundation, a British counter-extremism think-tank, in 2009.

Mr. Brandon also called for new strategies in Western prisons to combat this trend.  

“A new, tailor-made approach is needed. Failure to take such steps not only risks allowing prisons to become hubs of radicalization, but also squanders the priceless opportunity to deradicalize leading extremists so that they can be used to deconstruct jihadist ideology,” he wrote.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Britain sentences radical Islamic preacher Anjem Choudary to five years
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today