Sepp Blatter suspension: Turning point for FIFA?

FIFA president Sepp Blatter and UEFA president Michel Platini have been barred from participating in all soccer-related activities for eight years, as part of a wider investigation into corruption in soccer's governing body. 

Patrick B. Kraemer/Keystone/AP
Suspended FIFA President Sepp Blatter answers to questions during his press conference to respond to the FIFA ethics committee's verdict, at former FIFA's headquarters Hotel Sonnenberg in Zurich, Switzerland, Monday.

The International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) ethics committee has banned both its president Sepp Blatter and Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) president Michel Platini for eight years from all soccer-related activities in a decision made Monday. A Swiss criminal investigation is ongoing.

The severity of the suspensions shocked the global soccer community. FIFA is no stranger to allegations of corruption, but legal attempts to pin wrongdoing on Mr. Blatter have been mostly fruitless so far.

Blatter and Mr. Platini were removed due to conflict of interest and disloyalty to FIFA in a $2 million payment deal. In the deal, Blatter approved Platini to take $2 million of FIFA money in 2011 to compensate for work done as a presidential advisor for three years from 1999-2002.

In their verdict, the judges said, "Neither in his written statement nor in his personal hearing was Mr. Blatter able to demonstrate another legal basis for this payment. By failing to place FIFA's interests first and abstain from doing anything which could be contrary to FIFA's interests, Mr. Blatter violated his fiduciary duty to FIFA.”

In addition to the bans, Blatter and Platini were fined $50,250 and $80,400, respectively.

Corruption has been alleged within FIFA since at least 1991, when the current corruption indictment against FIFA alleges officials with soccer’s governing body worked with sports-marketing firms and other groups to accept bribes in exchange for television contracts.

Until Blatter announced his resignation on June 2, he had been one of FIFA’s longest-serving presidents, having been elected to the position in 1998. Both Blatter and Platini insisted that they had done no wrong.

In a news conference in Zurich, Blatter said, “I'll be back, thank you."

Platini told The Associated Press, "My behavior has always been faultless and I'm at peace with my own conscience."

Platini also intends to file a lawsuit for damages. In a statement, UEFA voiced its support for him, saying, “UEFA supports Michel Platini's right to a due process and the opportunity to clear his name.”

The removal comes at an especially inopportune time for Platini, who was seeking a bid to replace Blatter in the upcoming February 26 election for president of FIFA. Platini wants to be able to clear his name in order to be able to be declared a candidate.

"I'm convinced that my fate was sealed before the Dec. 18 hearing and that this decision is just a pathetic maneuver to hide a true will of taking me out of the football world," he told AP.

The $2 million payment for Platini emerged when a Swiss bank reported it, as part of compliance practices with monitoring money-laundering. Blatter said that the failure to report the payment was an administrative error.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Sepp Blatter suspension: Turning point for FIFA?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today