Judge in Argentina throws out case involving prosecutor's death

Judge Daniel Rafecas has dismissed allegations of a cover-up in a case that has grabbed the national attention of Argentina.

|
Agustin Marcarian/AP
This Feb. 23, 2015 photo shows, through tree branches, Federal Judge Daniel Rafecas, right, arriving to the federal court house in Buenos Aires, Argentina. On Thursday, Feb. 26, 2015, Rafecas dismissed prosecutor Alberto Nisman's allegations that President Cristina Fernandez tried to cover-up the alleged involvement of Iranian officials in the 1994 bombing of a Jewish center in Buenos Aires.

An Argentine judge on Thursday dismissed allegations that President Cristina Fernandez tried to cover up Iran's purported involvement in the deadly bombing of a Jewish center in 1994.

The judge "discontinued" the case brought by prosecutor Alberto Nisman, who was found dead in mysterious circumstances in January the day before he was to appear in Congress to discuss his criminal complaint.

The scandal shocked the country and hurt the government's credibility ahead of October's presidential election.

The decision by judge Daniel Rafecas sparked divided opinions on whether the government had a hand in the ruling. About 400,000 Argentines marched last week to demand a more independent judiciary.

The allegation that Fernandez sought to whitewash the investigation into the truck bombing of the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires was first made by Nisman in mid-January.

Four days later he was found dead, spawning a torrent of conspiracy theories and raising long-festering questions about interference and intimidation in the justice system.

Thursday's ruling will alleviate some political pressure on Fernandez, whose popularity has dipped during the scandal.

"The judge's decision certainly favors Fernandez, but it will probably not have an impact on the October elections," said Ignacio Labaqui, Argentina analyst for Medley Global Advisors.

"The damage (to candidates allied with Fernandez) is already there," he added. "According to polls, the bulk of public opinion believes that Nisman's accusation was true and that he was murdered."

The inquiry into the alleged cover-up was given this month to prosecutor Gerardo Pollicita, who submitted the complaint.

"The judge held that the ... complaint was not strong enough to initiate criminal proceedings because it did not support the alleged cover-up or obstruction of the investigation" into the AMIA bombing, said a statement from the judiciary branch's information service.

Pollicita's office said no decision had yet been made on whether to appeal.

Fernandez called Nisman's cover-up claims "absurd" and said he had been duped by rogue security agents. She said she believed the agents then killed Nisman after using him to smear her. Iran has consistently denied the allegations.

Nisman's body was found in his apartment on Jan. 18, a bullet in his head.

The ruling came in time for the president's last state of the union address on March 1 and decreased the likelihood that Nisman scandal would escalate in the short term.

Still, public opinion remained divided.

"The judge must be pretty sure that there is not enough incriminatory evidence to throw this out. It has been such an important case for the country," said telecoms worker Edith Gallante.

But 26-year-old kiosk owner Leonardo Venega said: "I think the government had a hand in this, as always. The judge should not have thrown this out."

(Additional reporting and writing by Richard Lough; Editing by W Simon,Grant McCool and David Gregorio)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Judge in Argentina throws out case involving prosecutor's death
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/2015/0226/Judge-in-Argentina-throws-out-case-involving-prosecutor-s-death
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe