Income inequality: How does the US compare to other countries?

The US is not alone in facing a widening gap between rich and poor, though it's leading most of the developed world. Here are several countries comparable to the US in income inequality and their experiences with its trends.

US in global context

Molly Riley / Reuters
Homeless men sleep in a park while people wait in line to purchase pizza from a pizza mobile in Washington in Oct. 2010.

Income inequality was front and center during President Obama’s State of the Union Address last night, throwing into the limelight several uncomfortable truths: America’s rich-poor gap is one of the worst among developed economies, and it appears to be widening further.   

In this the United States finds itself in growing company. Income disparities within most countries have inched upward over the past few decades (though disparity among countries could be falling). Measurements for income inequality are evolving, but the most common remains the Gini index, which measures the dispersion of incomes on a scale of zero (perfectly equal) to 100 (perfectly unequal).

Rising income disparity among the world’s largest economies in particular was highlighted in a May 2013 report by the OECD, a group of 34 mostly developed countries. Disparity is on the rise in three-quarters of OECD states. In the OECD as a whole, the richest 10 percent of the population earned about 9.5 times that of the poorest 10 percent, with Gini index averaging about 32. The US exceeds that average by about 6 points, standing at 38.

Here are several countries comparable to the US in income inequality.

1 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.