Military bear brunt of Yemen terror attacks

Al Qaeda's local franchise is suspected of carrying out a brazen attack on Thursday against Yemen's heavily guarded Ministry of Defense. 

Mohammed Hamoud/AP
Smoke raises after an explosion at the Defense Ministry complex in Sanaa, Yemen, Thursday.

A terror attack in Yemen's capital has underscored a deepening security vacuum and raised the risk level to civil servants and members of the military, one of the few sources of reliable jobs in the Arab world's poorest country.

Al Qaeda's local franchise is suspected by some to be behind this and other recent attacks on military installations in Yemen. Thursday's attack on the Ministry of Defense killed at least 52 people, including seven foreigners, during a prolonged battle inside a heavily guarded compound. 

The incident comes less than three months after a deadly series of attacks on military installations in Yemen's southeast. In September, gunmen staged bloody attacks within the space of two weeks that bore marked similarities to Thursday’s attack in Sanaa, including the use of suicide car bombings to break through defenses.

Yemen has also seen a spike in assassinations of military and security officers, both in Sanaa and in other parts of Yemen. The US military has conducted small-scale training of Yemeni forces in order to beef up their counter-terrorism capability. Many residents of the capital have relatives working for the military, a major employer in Yemen. 

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for Thursday's attack. Suspicions largely fell on Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), a Yemen-based franchise of the global terrorist group. Analysts said the attack bore many of the hallmarks of AQAP.

“Rather than the parts of ministry building housing the offices of military higher-ups, the attackers appeared to focus on medical clinic, which is less secure,” says Fernando Carvajal, a Yemen-based analyst. “The aim appears to have been to get as high of a death count as possible – something that’s a signature of groups like AQAP.”

As Yemenis headed to work on Thursday, anticipation of the coming weekend soon turned to widespread panic and terror. Explosions punctured the sounds of morning gridlock as smoke filled the skies of Sanaa; traffic soon drew to a standstill as news spread of the attack.

It emerged that fighters had penetrated the Ministry of Defense. An initial car bomb shattered windows and caused chaos in the vicinity, allowing a second vehicle filled with gunmen in military uniforms to break through the perimeter of the ministry itself. This was followed by intermittent gun-battles that left many dead, including doctors and patients inside the ministry’s medical clinic.

While suspicions fell on AQAP, some Yemenis also speculated that it could be a result of divisions inside the military. The attack came as Defense Minister  Mohamed Nasser Ahmed led a delegation to the US. Some raised the possibility that rival factions were trying to capitalize on his absence from the country. 

Regardless of where they place direct responsibility for the attack, however, Yemenis pin the blame mostly on a government that seems too weak or distracted to provide security for its people, even in the capital itself. 

“It doesn’t make much of a difference who is behind this – whether it’s the AQAP we imagine or something else,” says Farea al-Muslimi, a Yemeni writer and political activist. “Ultimately, it’s a sign that the current government is unable to guarantee security – something that is one of its most basic duties to its citizens.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.