Rise of euroskeptic party in Britain rubs off on Cameron

David Cameron has played up his Britain-over-Europe credentials in the past few days, including at the Tories' annual conference, to stave off the rising euroskeptic UK Independence Party.

Jon Super/AP
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron speaks at the Conservative Party Conference, Birmingham, England, Wednesday, Oct. 10.

A day after giving his strongest backing yet to a possible referendum on Britain’s often volatile membership of the European Union, Prime Minister David Cameron drew cheers from his party’s faithful at their annual conference Wednesday as he recounted vetoing an EU-wide accord to coordinate budget policies last year.

“I said no, Britain comes first and I vetoed the EU treaty,” said Mr. Cameron, whose party’s euroskeptic right wing has more MPs than ever and is clamoring to claw back powers from Brussels, the de facto capital of the EU. Expectations are also growing that he will demand a freeze in the EU budget at a summit next month, allowing him to claim that the UK is not propping up the eurozone.

The Conservative leader’s tough approach to Europe this week, however, has also had much to do with neutralizing the threat from the rival United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), which recent polls suggest is no longer a marginal player in British politics.

The party, which advocates a referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Union, was level with the Liberal Democrats as the third-largest party, with garnering 8 percent of support, according to a poll last month.  In the previous month, it emerged at 12 percent, two points ahead of the Lib Dems.

UKIP's voter base comes traditionally from working-class and lower-middle-class older males, and has frequently been characterized simply as a protest vehicle for voters disillusioned with mainstream politics – despite having an activist base that often very clearly identifies itself with Ron Paul-style libertarian ideology. But the party is hoping to spring a surprise next month in elections to elect regional police commissioners.

And the party is eying an even bigger prize in 2014’s elections to the European Parliament, where it already has 12 MEPs (European Parliament members). If it finished ahead of the Tories, who topped the poll in 2009, the pressure for a referendum would reach a crescendo and Cameron’s own leadership of the Conservative party would face an existential threat.

Cameron sought to neutralize the UKIP threat and satiate euroskeptic calls in his own party Tuesday when he described a referendum as the "cleanest, neatest, simplest, and most sensible" way to obtain the "fresh consent" of the British electorate after moves to reorder the EU following the crisis in the eurozone.

But will it be enough to stem the rise of UKIP, and prevent it from stealing Tory seats in a British general election for the first time? (Ironically, UKIP remains without a presence in the Westminster Parliament, whose primacy it wants to uphold.)

According to Robert Ford, a politics lecturer at the University of Manchester who has researched UKIP in depth, says it’s true that the party are polling better than they ever have outside of the immediate run-up to European Parliament election, and a lot of that would seem to be coming from disgruntled Conservative voters camping out with UKIP.

But Dr. Ford also has doubts over UKIP’s ability to turn headlines about polling into actual Westminster seats, mainly because its two big campaign issues of Europe and immigration are slipping among the public’s priorities.

He adds: “I would expect UKIP to do extremely well it the next European Parliament election. In that sense they are going to be a very important feature of British politics in the next two years, but whether they then are able to convert that into a general election, that is when we will find if it is a flash in the pan or not. There is no evidence that they are building the basis of support.”

“In fact there is a danger here for the Conservatives, because if they tack too far to the right in an attempt to keep the UKIP vote down, then they may lose Liberal Democrat leaning voters at the other end," he says. "In fact, Labour can pick up more seats through Lib Dem voters switching to Labour than the Tories can lose through Tory voters switching to UKIP.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.