Phone hacking scandal: Two UK media leaders charged with conspiracy

Rebekah Brooks and Andrew Coulson are among those who were charged with conspiracy today in a scandal that embarrassed Prime Minister Cameron's administration.

Paul Hackett/Reuters
Andrew Coulson, the former spokesman for British Prime Minister David Cameron makes a statement to the press outside his home in Dulwich, southeast London, July 24. Mr. Coulson and Rebekah Brooks, the former head of Rupert Murdoch's UK News Corp., are to be charged with phone-hacking offenses.
Sang Tan/AP
This June 13 file photo shows Rebekah Brooks, former head of Rupert Murdoch’s UK News Corp., leaving Westminster Magistrates' Courts after she was granted bail on charges of attempting to cover up tabloid phone-hacking, London.

Two prominent British media figures are charged with conspiracy today together with six others in a phone-hacking scandal that has felled much of Rupert Murdoch’s British tabloid news empire and shaken the British political establishment since coming to light last summer.

Rebekah Brooks, former head of Mr. Murdoch’s UK News Corp.; Andy Coulson, a former Murdoch chief editor and Prime Minister David Cameron’s ex-media chief; and six of 27 others who have been arrested in the past year are involved. They are charged with conspiracy in using often salacious or painfully personal material gained from illegally hacked cellphones as fodder for tabloid stories, embarrassing Mr. Cameron's administration. 

As editors wielding enormous clout in the shaping of British media stories, Ms. Brooks and Mr. Coulson were much feared and often hated by British politicians and elites as the engines of a Murdoch machine that made and broke members of parliament and prime ministers. The two figures deny any involvement in phone hacking.

Martin Moore, director of the UK-based Media Standards Trust, argues that prosecutors did not necessarily have to bring charges at this point, implying there must have been enough evidence already to make a case, “and we shall see how much this amounts to over the next few months. But they have sped up the process.”

British police have alleged as many as 4,700 cases of phone hacking, but prosecutors are charging some 600 instances from 2002 to 2006. 

The cellphones of British royals and celebrities were long known to be hacked as grist for embarrassing tabloid headlines. But the practice also spread to the phones of ordinary Brits, including war veterans and minors. 

Milly Dowler scandal

The boil came to a head last summer when the British newspaper the Guardian broke the Milly Dowler story, showing that News of the World editors had hacked the cellphone of a murdered 13-year-old girl to listen to and delete voice-mail messages. Their interference with the girl's account misled officials and hampered the investigation.

As the scandal and outrage swelled during last July, Murdoch closed the 157-year-old News of the World Sunday tabloid. The Australian-born tycoon then found his efforts to acquire the controlling interest in the most lucrative segment of British media – the British Sky Broadcasting Group satellite cable station ­– blocked. Control of Sky TV was seen as the jewel in Murdoch’s ample British crown of media dominion.

This week, ahead of the charges, Murdoch resigned as director of all his British media firms, marking the first time he is not the head of a media corporation in Britain in more than 50 years. He has given interviews painting British politics and business in unflattering terms.

Mr. Moore argues that Murdoch’s political influence in “the short and medium term … has much less weight [than before],” but he says there is no legal or institutional barrier for the 81-year-old magnate to try and “reengineer a BSkyB bid.”

Cameron's embarrassment

It may well be Cameron who will face the most difficult short-term questions over his relations with Brooks and Coulson, casting a shadow over his leadership.

As part of the Leveson inquiry set up last summer to investigate the phone-hacking allegations, e-mails sent by Brooks to Cameron as he ran for office include comments ahead of a key Conservative Party meeting, while Murdoch was reconsidering its support for Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown in favor of Cameron.

“I am so rooting for you tomorrow not just as a proud friend but because professionally we’re definitely in this together! Speech of your life? Yes he Cam,” her message read, with the final comment a play on President Obama’s campaign slogan.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to