Charles Koch might prefer Hillary Clinton to GOP presidential candidates

In specific reference to current GOP candidates Koch told an interviewer, 'These personal attacks and pitting one person against the other ... I don't know how we could support ‘em.'

Bo Rader/The Wichita Eagle/AP
In this May 22, 2012, file photo, Charles Koch speaks in his office at Koch Industries in Wichita, Kan.

On Sunday, Charles Koch, the billionaire industrialist and prominent conservative political donor, said that it is “possible” Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton would make a better president than some of the candidates for the GOP nomination.

In the interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl aired on Sunday Mr. Koch was asked if he thought Bill Clinton was a better president than George W. Bush, responding, “in some ways. In other ways, I mean he wasn't an exemplar. But as far as the growth of government, the increase in spending, it was two and a half times [more] under Bush than it was under Clinton.”

The interviewer followed up by asking if Koch thought another Clinton – Hillary – could be a preferable option over the potential GOP candidates. “It’s possible,” Koch responded, “it’s possible.”

He went on to qualify that before he could ultimately support her, Clinton’s implemented policies would have to be different from those she has publicly claimed and campaigned on. "We would have to believe her actions would be quite different than her rhetoric. Let me put it that way," Koch said.

Charles Koch, who along with his brother David, comprise a powerful political team, consistently contributing enormous amounts of money to conservative and libertarian candidates.

Following a three-day retreat in 2012, the Koch brothers along with 250 to 300 other individuals pledged to contribute $100 million to oppose and defeat President Obama’s reelection campaign, with $60 million of that coming from the two brothers alone ($60 million from Charles and $20 million from David).

That was the ninth year they had hosted the controversial conference through their umbrella political organization Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, in the California desert. In 2015 the Freedom Partners’ conference included appearances by Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Scott Walker, among other previously prominent candidates in an effort to court the nearly $1 billion that the conference represents leading up to this year’s election.

However, as the current political situation develops, the Koch brothers have withheld their support, paying out less than half of their $889 million budget for the 2016 election.

Referring to the current Republican race, Koch said in his Sunday interview, “we haven't put a penny in any of these campaigns, pro or con," Koch said. "That's not what we do. What we're trying to do is build alliances to make the country better.”

In specific reference to current GOP candidates Koch continued, ”These personal attacks and pitting one person against the other – that's the message you're sending the country," he said. ”You're role models and you're terrible role models. So how – I don't know how we could support ‘em."

Koch addressed Donald Trump’s anti-Muslim comments specifically saying his proposal for a  temporary travel ban is “antithetical,” continuing with, "what was worse was this 'we'll have them all registered,'" Koch said. "That's reminiscent of Nazi Germany. I mean – that's monstrous as I said at the time."

These comments from Charles Koch come as Hillary Clinton continues to edge out Bernie Sanders in the democratic race, holding a 15-point lead among voters heading into Pennsylvania.

While the billionaire conservative contributors have been withholding their support for the current GOP candidates, it is difficult to imagine the powerful Koch duo supporting a Democratic candidate for president.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.