Why is the FBI getting involved in Flint?

Along with city and state government, there are now federal agencies, including the FBI, looking into Flint's water supply situation.

Ryan Garza/Detroit Free Press/AP
Flint residents raise their arms during a town hall meeting about the Flint water crisis on Monday, Feb. 1, 2016, at Flint Trinity Missionary Baptist Church in Flint, Mich. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality has undertaken a five-part strategy to determine whether Flint's water, which has become contaminated with lead, is safe to drink.

Multiple federal agencies are now involved in a criminal investigation into the Flint, Mich., water crisis.

Gina Balaya, a spokeswoman for the US Attorney's Office in Detroit, said in an email to media that federal prosecutors in Michigan are "working with a multi-agency investigation team on the Flint water contamination matter, including the FBI, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the EPA's Office of Inspector General ... and the EPA's Criminal Investigation Division."

A governor-appointed emergency manager was overseeing Flint when it switched its source of tap water from Detroit's system to the Flint River in April 2014 as a cost-saving measure. The river water proved corrosive, and leached lead into the city’s tap water, exposing thousands of residents to toxic levels of the element, a problem that early estimates put at hundreds of millions of dollars to solve.

Ms. Balaya shared the FBI’s participation, alongside other agencies that investigate potential criminal wrongdoing, late Monday when asked by the Detroit Free Press if there were concerns over the EPA leading a federal investigation, given that the EPA regional director resigned over the drinking water crisis effective Feb. 1, amid public outcry over the EPA's handling of Flint’s toxic water.

The FBI disclosed it is joining the investigation as the US House Oversight Committee prepares to hold its first hearing on Flint Wednesday.

The Detroit Free Press reports that it is unlikely former Flint emergency manager Darnell Earley will agree to testify. Given it is now a criminal investigation, witnesses may opt to exercise their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination and decline to testify at legislative hearings.

Keith Creagh, the new director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, is expected at the hearing. The previous director resigned in December.

The EPA's acting deputy assistant administrator in its Office of Water has also been invited to testify, along with an EPA researcher who voiced concerns early on about lead in the water, Reuters reports.

Last week, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette named a special prosecutor and investigator to look into possible crimes related to the crisis at the state level.

A spokesman for Michigan Governor Rick Snyder said the office "will cooperate fully with any authorities looking at what happened in Flint with the water. It’s important to look at missteps at all three levels of government – local, state and federal – so such a crisis doesn’t occur again."

But as The Christian Science Monitor reported Monday, Flint residents are not just waiting to see if government officials will cooperate to bring clean water to the city’s taps. It is also up in the air whether public officials can rebuild the public’s trust in a place where morale is low.

“I had already planned on moving because of the crime, the schools, and the abandoned buildings,” Flint native James Chad Richardson told Yahoo News. “Then the water is like, OK, wow. How many punches to the head am I gonna take?”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.