Why are white supremacists backing Trump?

A white supremacist group has thrown its support behind the current leading GOP presidential contender and is reaching out to Iowa voters to let them know.

Jim Cole/AP/File
In this Jan. 11, 2016 file photo, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a campaign stop in Windham, N.H.

If, as Donald Trump appears to know well, all press is good press, is all support good support?

Homes across Iowa began receiving pro-Trump robocalls Saturday, weeks ahead of the Iowa caucuses.

The group behind the calls is American Freedom Party (AFP), a white supremacist group that endorsed the Republican candidate on Friday, calling him their "Great White Hope." 

"We don't need Muslims. We need smart, well-educated white people who will assimilate to our culture. Vote Trump," Jared Taylor, a white nationalist and editor of the supremacist magazine American Renaissance, says on the call.

The robocall campaign is paid for by the American National super PAC, led by the AFP, which Dylann Roof, the man who killed nine people in a shooting at a historically black church in Charleston, cited as his inspiration.

The robocall, which has drawn more attention, and contention, to Mr. Trump's candidacy, underscores how racially charged the presidential contest, and particularly the Republican race, has become.

Arguably, that's largely thanks to Trump, who emerged as a surprise front-runner by tapping into some voters' fears and anger. He declared his candidacy in a speech denouncing Mexican immigrants as "rapists" and "criminals" and has used his campaign to stake a series of controversial positions, including forcibly deporting 11 million undocumented immigrants and temporarily banning all Muslims from entering the United States.

To be clear, Trump does not endorse white supremacist groups, and two staffers were fired from his campaign for posting racially offensive material on social media.

His comments appear to have roused white supremacist groups, for whom Trump is a mainstream candidate who shares, and loudly asserts, many of their decidedly non-mainstream views.

"Clearly our movement has been energized by Trump," Richard Spencer, director of the National Policy Institute, a far-right group dedicated to promoting the interests of white Americans, told Reuters.

"I think what he's done is a very important thing," Mr. Taylor told The Washington Post. "He's the first candidate in decades to say almost explicitly that immigration should be in the interest of Americans and not just immigrants."

"He's attractive to many Americans who see their country slipping through their fingers," he added. "You don't want to end your days living in an outpost of Haiti or Guatemala do you?"

The unsolicited support – former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke also recently endorsed Trump – puts the candidate in a delicate position. 

When Bloomberg asked him about the public endorsement from Mr. Duke, who ran for the GOP nomination in 1992, Trump responded, "I don’t need his endorsement; I certainly wouldn’t want his endorsement. I don’t need anyone’s endorsement.” When asked if he would repudiate Duke’s support, Trump replied: “Sure, I would if that would make you feel better.”

But he didn't appear to be particularly distressed about it, either, adding, "People like me across the board. Everyone likes me."

But at least one white supremacist says Trump may be in denial about who his message is attracting.

Taylor told the New Yorker last year, "I’m sure he would repudiate any association with people like me, but his support comes from people who are more like me than he might like to admit.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.