Brian C. Frank/Reuters
Actress and screenwriter Lena Dunham campaigns for U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at Eight Seven Central screen printers in Des Moines, Iowa, January 9, 2016.

Lena Dunham and Hillary Clinton: 'Girls' helping girls

HBO star Lena Dunham spent Saturday campaigning in Iowa for Hillary Clinton. Clinton could use Dunham’s pull on the Millennial front, as she is currently losing this demographic to her Democratic competitor Sen. Bernie Sanders from Vermont.

Lena Dunham traveled through Iowa with humor and conviction Saturday, telling the state's early caucus voters why former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has her vote. 

“Nothing gets me angrier than when people say I’m voting for Hillary Clinton simply because she’s female,” Dunham said at her first event Saturday. “[It’s] as if I have some feminist version of beer-goggles, lets call it ‘estrogen blindness,’ and I kind of walk like a zombie towards the nearest [woman]. This assumption is condescending at best and it is sharply misogynisitic at worst.” 

But as a self-proclaimed feminist, Dunham told audiences that she thinks a female commander-in-chief is what the country needs.

“While Hillary Clinton’s anatomy is not the reason I’m voting for her, there’s nothing that would send a stronger message to this country, and to the world at large than sending a competent, strong, essential woman to the highest office.” 

And as Dunham’s unapologetic and candid comments in a "HILLARY" dress suggest, the HBO actress may serve as an antidote for Clinton’s politically correct, pantsuit-wearing personality. 

“Lena can say things that Hillary wants to say but can’t,” one audience member told Time. 

Dunham has become “a crucial ambassador for the Democratic presidential candidate as she looks to solidify her support among millennial women,” writes The New York Times. 

Clinton could use Dunham’s pull on the Millennial front, as she is currently losing this demographic to her Democratic competitor Sen. Bernie Sanders from Vermont. 

In an October survey by NBC News, only 26 percent of Millennials supported Clinton which is far less than Sanders’ 54 percent. And a November survey of 18 to 29-year-olds by Harvard University’s Institute of Politics found that 35 percent of Democratic primary voters favored Clinton, compared to 41 percent who favored Sanders.

And both candidates know they can’t underestimate the power of the Millennial vote: It could represent 36 percent of eligible voters in the 2016 presidential election. 

The competitive Democratic race has invited celebrity endorsements on both sides. Besides Dunham, some of Clinton’s supporters include singers Katy Perry, Beyonce, and Snoop Dogg as well as actresses Olivia Wilde, Kerry Washington, and Jennifer Lopez. Sanders has less but still notable celebrity supporters including musician Dave Matthews, comedian Will Ferrell, and MMA fighter Ronda Rousey. 

As both Sanders and Clinton try to win over millennials, young voters may agree with Dunham’s "it’s not about gender" argument – even if it actually ends up helping Sanders.

“It would be cool to have a woman president, but that’s not why I would vote for her,” Maggie Mineart, 26, told the Guardian after Dunham’s speech in Iowa. “If I wanted to just vote for a woman, I could vote for Carly Fiorina too, but I’m not.” 

And Ashley O’Leary, 24, told Time after Dunham’s speech that celebrity endorsements and gender don’t impact her political beliefs.

“When you take all the celebrity away, I find Bernie honest and genuine and I think he’s with the people more than she is” says O’Leary. She wants a fellow female president, but gender doesn’t usurp policy. “It would be a huge milestone. But it needs to be the right woman to take that spot. I don’t know if this is our time.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Lena Dunham and Hillary Clinton: 'Girls' helping girls
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today