Are state-funded universities on the decline?

Some officials are concerned that they could vanish completely if current trends continue.

AP Photo/Seth Perlman/File
In Springfield, Illinois, students and lobbyists gather outside the Senate chambers to lobby their lawmakers against budget cuts affecting education spending at the state Capitol, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2015.

If the current pace of state funding continues, some estimates suggest that the system of state public universities could vanish within the next 100 years.

Both conservative states like Kansas, and more liberal ones like California, have recently struggled with declines in revenue, which in turn has translated into a sharp decrease in financial aide for all students. In Kansas, statewide budget cuts have meant a decline of 40 percent in financial aid money over the past 15 years – which has left more students picking up more of their share of the cost of tuition.

“It doesn’t take that long to get down to nothing," Bernadette Gray-Little, the chancellor of the University of Kansas, told The Atlantic, expressing her concern that the loss of state funds may mean the eventual decline of publicly-funded state universities as we currently understand them.

“Here in Kansas, our state has incrementally but consistently disinvested in higher education to the point that it is now significantly challenging the University of Kansas’ ability to serve Kansans and society,” she said in a statement.

In California, the situation has been even more severe. Budget cuts resulted in a tuition increase for in-state students of 5 percent in 2014, prompting massive student protests throughout the state. One reason for the change was the 2008 recession, which caused an approximate $460-million decline in state funding across the entire University of California system.

“What were once public universities are now private universities that receive some subsidy from the states,” David Plank, an economist at Policy Analysis for California Education, a non-partisan research center, told TIME.

In order to meet their financial needs, some universities are turning, with increased frequency, to their sports teams. Some schools are expanding their athletics facilities, while other schools’ athletics directors have considered offering alcohol for sale at football games as a way to generate more revenue for both their most popular teams and their schools.

Other students have turned away from public universities entirely, and are choosing to attend community colleges instead. The attraction lies not only in the offerings those two-year institutions provide, but also the potential to transfer credits to more traditional, “name-brand” colleges and universities once their two years are finished.

Some students, however, struggle with fears that a community college experience will not be fulfilling.

"My thing was that I worked hard in high school and I deserved to go straight to a four-year school," Sehrish Shah, a student at Northern Virginia Community College, told The Washington Post about the hesitation she first felt about attending a community college. "I was judgmental in the beginning. Now that I look at it, I can't believe I used to think that."

Public academic institutions are not alone in facing financial difficulties. In 2015, after years of financial challenges, Sweet Briar College, a private liberal arts school for women in Virginia, announced that it would be closing. A successful aid campaign from current students and alumni called Saving Sweet Briar, Inc., saved the school, but brought it back with extremely limited faculty and a much smaller student body.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Are state-funded universities on the decline?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today