Police shooting of Tamir Rice justified, two separate reports find

Subodh Chandra, a lawyer representing Rice's family, called the reports a 'whitewash' effort by investigators.

AP
This undated photo provided by the family's attorney shows Tamir Rice. Rice, 12, was fatally shot by police in Cleveland after brandishing what turned out to be a replica gun, triggering an investigation into his death.

Two independent reports submitted to the Ohio prosecutor’s office on the death of 12 year-old Tamir Rice found the shooting by a Cleveland police officer justified.

Released Saturday night by the Cuyahoga County prosecutor’s office, the two separate reports filed by a retired FBI agent and a Denver prosecutor both found that the patrolman who fatally shot Tamir on November 22 last year utilized reasonable force because the officer had reason to believe the boy posed a serious threat.

In a 911 call, Tamir is described as a man waving and pointing a gun. Police have stated Tamir was shot moments after the patrolmen pulled up to the boy at a public park — after he allegedly refused to put his hands up for police, and instead reached for his waistband. The gun was later identified as an airsoft pellet gun.

Subodh Chandra, a lawyer representing Rice's family, called the reports a "whitewash" effort by investigators.

"These supposed "experts" — all pro-police — dodge the simple fact that the officers rushed Tamir and shot him immediately without assessing the situation in the least," Chandra said in a statement. "Reasonable jurors could find that conduct unreasonable."

The reports, which only probed the constitutionality of the use of force, and were authored by experts in Fourth Amendment rights, have been submitted to a grand jury as further evidence that will help determine whether Timothy Loehmann faces criminal charges.

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy J. McGinty said he commissioned and released the reports in the interest of transparency.

Retired FBI special agent Kimberly A. Crawford said first-year patrolman Loehmann had to make a "split-second" decision to use deadly force, Reuters reports.

"Loehmann's attention would be focused on Rice's hands as they moved towards his waist band and lifted his jacket. Unquestionably, the actions of Rice could reasonably be perceived as a serious threat to Officer Loehmann," Ms. Crawford wrote.

"It is my conclusion that Officer Loehmann's use of deadly force falls within the realm of reasonableness under the dictates of the Fourth Amendment," Crawford wrote.

The report  from S. Lamar Sims, senior chief deputy district attorney in Denver, cited the video of Loehmann exiting his patrol car quickly and ducking for cover, which the Denver DA interpreted as reacting to an imminent threat.

"The officers did not create the violent situation — they were responding to a situation fraught with the potential for violence to citizens," Mr. Sims wrote in his report.

"We are not reaching any conclusions from these reports," Mr. McGinty, the prosecutor, said in a statement. "The gathering of evidence continues, and the grand jury will evaluate it all."

The reports come as trial preparations begin in Baltimore, Md. in the case of Freddie Gray, who died while in the custody of Baltimore Police last April, triggering massive protests in the city. Six Baltimore officers have been charged in Mr. Gray's arrest and death. The first trial — of Officer William Porter — is scheduled to begin Nov. 30.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.