Rand Paul on 2016: Why the GOP candidate says he's not going anywhere

Despite scrutiny of his weakening poll numbers and disappointing fundraising, the Kentucky senator says he's here to stay.

Chris Usher/REUTERS/CBS News
Republican presidential candidate Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) speaking on "Face the Nation" with John Dickerson, in Washington, D.C. in September.

It’s been a tough week for Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul.

The Republican presidential candidate has spent the week explaining why his campaign still even exists, appearing on outlet after outlet to defend himself from speculation that weakening poll numbers and a cash-strapped campaign would – or should – lead him to drop out.

This week, fellow GOP candidate Donald Trump mocked Sen. Paul on Twitter, writing, “Rand Paul has been driven out of the race by my statements about him – he will announce soon.”

Asked to respond during an interview with CNN, Paul shrugged off Mr. Trump’s comments.

“I guess it’s part of his bravado, his shtick,” he said. “But I’ll tell you this: I think we’ll be around just as long as Trump, or longer.”

But Trump isn’t the only one broadcasting these predictions. The senator raised just $2.5 million this quarter, a disappointing showing that adds insult to injury as polls peg his support at a national average of 2.4 percent, according to Real Clear Politics.

CNBC, which will host the next Republican debate on Oct. 28, has said that candidates polling at an average of 3 percent in the five-week period beforehand will secure a spot onstage.

And one of the three super PACs behind Paul’s presidential run has lost confidence in the candidate, saying publicly it has refused to keep raising money, reports Politico.

Ed Crane, who cofounded libertarian think tank the Cato Institute and heads up a group named PurplePAC, said he believed the senator had abandoned his libertarian views.

“I have stopped raising money for him until I see the campaign correct its problems,” said Mr. Crane to Politico. “I wasn’t going to raise money to spend on a futile crusade.”

Before that, PurplePAC had helped raise around $1.2 million, nearly half of Paul’s total haul this quarter.

Paul’s greatest strength in appealing to voters across the board – a distinctive world view and message – can also be his greatest weakness, The Christian Science Monitor's Francine Kiefer reported earlier this year, as Paul's ideological standpoints can also be alienating to some voters.

For now, however, “the message from Paulworld is that the bad times are over,” The Washington Post wrote this week.

Based on interviews with the senator’s campaign team, the Post reports:

As of this week, the campaign has at least one county chair in all 99 Iowa counties, winning them over even as Paul's support was mired in the single digits. It has added new staff in the caucus state of Nevada, where it is currently holding onto an endorsement from a Republican state legislator who was reportedly switching to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.).

There are no layoffs, no triage plans, for a staff of more than 40 people, which was always designed to be lean. No one, according to the campaign, has been asked to take a pay cut or an IOU.

“I think the rumors of my demise are somewhat exaggerated, to say the least,” Paul said Sunday in an interview with Fox News

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.