George Washington makes SAT, ACT optional: Do standardized tests still matter?

George Washington University has joined a growing trend to drop the rigorous tests required for admissions.

Susan Walsh/AP
Akira Lee (front right) and Scheryl Duarte (l.) both seniors at Roosevelt High School, talk with Martin Copeland, the school's DC College Access Program adviser, as they fill out a college enrollment application at the school in Washington, Nov. 14, 2013. GW University announced Monday that undergraduate applicants will no longer be required to submit their SAT or ACT standardized test scores.

Undergraduate applicants to George Washington University will no longer have to submit their ACT or SAT test scores, the school announced on Monday.

University administrators were concerned that below-average standardized test scores were leading some otherwise strong students to not apply to the school, Dean of Admissions Karen Stroud Felton said in a statement Monday.

"Although we have long employed a holistic application review process, we had concerns that students who could be successful at GW felt discouraged from applying if their scores were not as strong as their high school performance," Ms. Felton said. "We want outstanding students from all over the world and from all different backgrounds – regardless of their standardized scores – to recognize GW as a place where they can thrive."

The change will take effect on August 1, according to the announcement on the University's website, which states:

Those applying to GW for the 2016-17 school year will have the option to include standardized test scores as part of their application. High school coursework and grades will continue to be the most important factors in GW's holistic review process, along with a student's writing skills, recommendations, involvement in school and community, and personal qualities and character. However, this year, students who do not think their SAT or ACT scores are an accurate reflection of their academic potential can choose not to submit them.

GW joins other colleges and universities across the nation making score submissions optional for applicants. There are some 180 public and private colleges in the U.S. News & World Report rankings that have made a similar shift, including Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C., Wesleyan University in Middletown, Conn., Bryn Mawr College in Bryn Mawr, Pa., and Temple University in Philadelphia, The Washington Post reports

A study published by the National Association for College Admission Counseling last year explains that optional testing policies at universities – those that make submitting SAT or ACT results optional for applicants – can offer important enrollment and financial planning benefits for college-bound students, The Christian Science Monitor reported.

The study found that those who took the standardized tests more often felt discouraged or cut off from the application process after receiving their test results, versus feeling encouraged to continue toward college or university. The study measured cumulative GPAs and college graduation rates for "submitters" – those who submitted standardized test scores – and "non-submitters" in universities with optional testing policies.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.